Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 09:17:25 +0800
From:   Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To:     Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
CC:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
        Christian K??nig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        "linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
        "dev@openvswitch.org" <dev@openvswitch.org>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "llvm@lists.linux.dev" <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
        "linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] slab: Introduce kmalloc_size_roundup()
Message-ID: <Yy0JJV4c3DffCF+4@feng-clx>
References: <20220922031013.2150682-1-keescook@chromium.org>
 <20220922031013.2150682-2-keescook@chromium.org>
 <YyxDFfKmSNNkHBFi@hyeyoo>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YyxDFfKmSNNkHBFi@hyeyoo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?us-ascii?Q?owj8151iRwJDfX+jX1EkBZacYNEQZ+4DrarNXuVKKWvghQTRrAVclv6Qq+l9?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?ygxc68zZCXFHrWRLFuG7lRAPF9ehB3dVcax1mBB8TK9kgeV+EkoyuVks97so?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?8kn2quQV6CVmCOzP6miUSSASQmqps/bHhuVdzp60nWaSBVYibKeBZZjDqPA8?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?RwFsU02OPnjT14XnjxyQ1/EcPaYf+LQ0L6X+wBMeWiofymaMFxH04EkwWSqL?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?PHfb5O4/xOZe+QGGxuBo9HWNtJR5lv4lSM7smiqlvWjIbWvZRx8eUCgwasqE?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?TKcyM2JJKSLLgMr855jqW9Q7kqOfldQtV/iMuPMqeMNMcENRC/MKuYedlRj/?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?8bYgsXT2rXt/ZcDjNiFOWh+so8s/oM/mTii1T8P1CZFwU8g2ad7rknPGPnTy?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?1VmPc9UQpe8quJJnNijgq8F7OJA1eaYfaCP6PdawuSQ6xKlP+yTCjHxNwZ0E?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?Sv9R0M5suOZV3ihcEMQ7ox/l1dRJizFKICCsyHoGjeFXAmNhVBDEyxVCS7iT?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?EP2TMdjDSILcwR3y//i8cJlmejQHzlZSy8CtgmdhLX4B+R8lepxkEX9yhqKH?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?Bi9NSHnZWNxDkgTfT04M500RLu1BwUVxWuyi/mvLCd7gXwXeI8nSVOGMo5Rg?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?dNf/2vnCIRx+NwblKOUlcl7zP7oaT+0/pO2IU+f/54dBjNuTr/W3qCMb3rn1?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?VfkZYgtRH62O7Oggps3WOXAKxMgysRPOEdSAHGELetvgBC+dAIFFwVjyqiYa?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?I/k/qGRLzlnCdAX7mbDErdnM340agdqbT2/wgq8gW6B1lJJ89Sgh5wPLE05S?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?eLXEkfJoQfReO35JE4lCw2BC8yJfr5g3ywfiALbMLY7Phi5rHFBu1pE+jtuO?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?XHOxiXonZy95JkwU790XsyRdR8eScPgz5o5sLUXK1QbFC3dA5NLx+PCLJ6AY?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?2BrtnhLAy25yVGOYIHZ/6Rp/LFUwcP5SxnyyviVqErhG8nlvE/6+IZXa1Z2E?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?w3OJpkqJw5WAVRfzq1OrhWNhiJ6lb8uvNKKeLNguZDVfg5KnIVQI3AhXacva?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?/LDlikCmgzqO+JLH2TMrkviNssITHCRjeh3wT7LO4Jr2j3mfGXS6sSU6aaEA?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?roM1NjQffBMm8CqCNrWQLy4Pq37jLNZ1EZ6CP0cMJro8eY5XTBMvXCmQQb9j?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?zt3VQcZoGRPp7PYFiDUH/oqURkY/reYUQHHGYbXm0dol9AL2QFwS1Iqd95As?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?W4R2HokMDZI0Dh0bnaxZEPso2W+2F9JhlDAiG1KwCnrFiqP78syEkC+DuISg?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?c8q+MQOj1/n0bnWapMAv9pz8cEzksNXJNkhmC/crR3LXR4AI+ook3DXrgw5U?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?zyTs3kWw8xPkCPFSV0JquRpITFTih8xi4FkgF+Ow58TcvQjoUpg6su8DXIQ+?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?i1PP7AQqETUe1Xf43ftPagC3iZjCBgkn7MeSl+covGXs7u4MVtJfsgem3+Tb?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?y+vZqwWss1JRZakS2ZLLwitCMQnRcyip6YyStxXjF+yoVSIdtMFI4ku9V6eH?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?pzHauWk33lkFYTL1ryHK4hfmvz/BxnPEMY4lWlCD?=
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: dc0ab040-ae7c-44e6-8509-08da9d01759a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN0PR11MB6304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2022 01:18:02.2591
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: REs2eeqwREID/61A/OqDNwf1VdpYcsGMa+CVnsln0X/rG4ol9P/vOb64oJHStPfdvzzu4p5rb+p2NA1Gk9mJVg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ0PR11MB5769
X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
        DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
        SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org

Thanks Hyeonggon for looping in me.

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 07:12:21PM +0800, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:10:02PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > In the effort to help the compiler reason about buffer sizes, the
> > __alloc_size attribute was added to allocators. This improves the scope
> > of the compiler's ability to apply CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS and (in the near
> > future) CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE. For most allocations, this works well,
> > as the vast majority of callers are not expecting to use more memory
> > than what they asked for.
> > 
> > There is, however, one common exception to this: anticipatory resizing
> > of kmalloc allocations. These cases all use ksize() to determine the
> > actual bucket size of a given allocation (e.g. 128 when 126 was asked
> > for). This comes in two styles in the kernel:
> > 
> > 1) An allocation has been determined to be too small, and needs to be
> >    resized. Instead of the caller choosing its own next best size, it
> >    wants to minimize the number of calls to krealloc(), so it just uses
> >    ksize() plus some additional bytes, forcing the realloc into the next
> >    bucket size, from which it can learn how large it is now. For example:
> > 
> > 	data = krealloc(data, ksize(data) + 1, gfp);
> > 	data_len = ksize(data);
> > 
> > 2) The minimum size of an allocation is calculated, but since it may
> >    grow in the future, just use all the space available in the chosen
> >    bucket immediately, to avoid needing to reallocate later. A good
> >    example of this is skbuff's allocators:
> > 
> > 	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc);
> > 	...
> > 	/* kmalloc(size) might give us more room than requested.
> > 	 * Put skb_shared_info exactly at the end of allocated zone,
> > 	 * to allow max possible filling before reallocation.
> > 	 */
> > 	osize = ksize(data);
> >         size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(osize);
> > 
> > In both cases, the "how large is the allocation?" question is answered
> > _after_ the allocation, where the compiler hinting is not in an easy place
> > to make the association any more. This mismatch between the compiler's
> > view of the buffer length and the code's intention about how much it is
> > going to actually use has already caused problems[1]. It is possible to
> > fix this by reordering the use of the "actual size" information.
> > 
> > We can serve the needs of users of ksize() and still have accurate buffer
> > length hinting for the compiler by doing the bucket size calculation
> > _before_ the allocation. Code can instead ask "how large an allocation
> > would I get for a given size?".
> > 
> > Introduce kmalloc_size_roundup(), to serve this function so we can start
> > replacing the "anticipatory resizing" uses of ksize().
> >
> 
> Cc-ing Feng Tang who may welcome this series ;)
 
Indeed! This will help our work of extending slub redzone check,
as we also ran into some trouble with ksize() users when extending
the redzone support to this extra allocated space than requested
size [1], and have to disable the redzone sanity for all ksize()
users [2].

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220719134503.GA56558@shbuild999.sh.intel.com/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220913065423.520159-5-feng.tang@intel.com/

Thanks,
Feng

> > [1] https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1599
> >     https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/183
> > 
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
> > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > ---