Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <74c6841dbc1edf3e965ea51a438542c2c497a15b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: Use internal TX queues for all drivers
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Wetzel <alexander@wetzel-home.de>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Wed, 05 Oct 2022 20:10:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87r0zmgwli.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <20220926161303.13035-1-alexander@wetzel-home.de>
         <96e9ad692842853cfe92a7e5de18136baf20a492.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <875ygyihhm.fsf@toke.dk>
         <bf6f9d8707021dc6017c7cb17805d63edea63333.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <87r0zmgwli.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4 (3.44.4-2.fc36) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 16:43 +0200, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote:
> > >=20
> > > This logic has implications for putting "urgent" frames (like PS(?)) =
on
> > > TXQs as well, of course, but that needs to be handled somehow anyway.=
..
> >=20
> > But that probably then anyway needs to be handled in next_txq()?
>=20
> Yeah, just meant that comment as an "for future reference", it doesn't
> impact this patch series (I think?)
>=20

Right now, no, but with the promised patch to make powersave use TXQs it
would, I think :)

johannes