Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@kernel.org>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Alexander Wetzel <alexander@wetzel-home.de>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: Use internal TX queues for all drivers
In-Reply-To: <74c6841dbc1edf3e965ea51a438542c2c497a15b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
References: <20220926161303.13035-1-alexander@wetzel-home.de>
 <96e9ad692842853cfe92a7e5de18136baf20a492.camel@sipsolutions.net>
 <875ygyihhm.fsf@toke.dk>
 <bf6f9d8707021dc6017c7cb17805d63edea63333.camel@sipsolutions.net>
 <87r0zmgwli.fsf@toke.dk>
 <74c6841dbc1edf3e965ea51a438542c2c497a15b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Thu, 06 Oct 2022 13:43:05 +0200
Message-ID: <8735c1fa9i.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 16:43 +0200, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote:
>> > >=20
>> > > This logic has implications for putting "urgent" frames (like PS(?))=
 on
>> > > TXQs as well, of course, but that needs to be handled somehow anyway=
...
>> >=20
>> > But that probably then anyway needs to be handled in next_txq()?
>>=20
>> Yeah, just meant that comment as an "for future reference", it doesn't
>> impact this patch series (I think?)
>>=20
>
> Right now, no, but with the promised patch to make powersave use TXQs it
> would, I think :)

Yup, hence why I wanted to give this "head's up" in advance so everyone
is aware :)

-Toke