Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc:     ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath11k vs ar_qrtr?
References: <20221130122807.GA31720@lst.de> <87o7so4nr2.fsf@kernel.org>
        <20221130125236.GA865@lst.de> <87k03c4mdb.fsf@kernel.org>
        <20221130132244.GB3055@lst.de>
Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:18:47 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20221130132244.GB3055@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of
        "Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:22:44 +0100")
Message-ID: <875yewnyx4.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:12:32PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Heh, I'm learning something new here. But I wonder why nobody else has
>> seen this?
>
> Good question.  How common is the ath11k hardware, especially on latptop
> where it is required for installation given that only installers tend
> to split up driver is non-standard ways.

I'm not sure about exact numbers, but not very common. I have seen
something like 4-5 different laptop models with either QCA6390 or
WCN6855 (both ath11k PCI devices). The PCI support was added to ath11k
in v5.10 (released Dec 2020) so maybe installers haven't caught up yet?
Just guessing though.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches