Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp158168rwb; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 00:00:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf61k2nZZIc6UMKmKcOMTCGAXu/iGpdvKK80aZ72JCfUsTgQPSz4sN0rvDTT2L/lh5zEFXSU X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1bcb:b0:574:ba25:1e43 with SMTP id o11-20020a056a001bcb00b00574ba251e43mr30387161pfw.63.1669881633459; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669881633; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qA3ktxqdo3kPqQbkvyLaoQYI81UUkV3GrvHV9gFRAtlDYUIVVuKr7Ux9nzO4QBmyE3 WmI0/bW4TPdkyYxZ9IjN2xRYZ0RGAxcW5zKQTNvmrSunXZj2P/Y6tlVhzoKtLsr8BAaC ApW12LaX2oso0QZRRdxt4gcDZyGSLYakioYtvbDDL01Mb/95RSnUoGG/QsQ23EWpJuoX iKpnnG65ZtOPA3aEPhE7PZEOfN3Xb7HySLlvg5K2L6M+aYzko1Z8TX6k0ue+z3e2iCgx rXGxE2vFwzo/9RnhO5DHFbg2u7yavnXRmqGaKS7wdCqqx+NsJ7r/fkxrFFpnoMqYVkt0 2NZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:date:to:from :subject:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=ow8C1FqQ2+KSeNUY/9D0bM7AIYgRt3TKkgCpElpsLkU=; b=wkZ2edeiVEEjPhbotMQeU27VqdMFFSOjUiQTAPOMcEddalrP/zfo0fOuKraCH6Imkr ct7huhkArjRK/I98hGVc0Nf2fSXpheZVrV20XXqH4Rw2Mi5VlSiWmoQhOf7nEi1Zk4Z5 m9JkfRWn8KSSVofHljuKA2+hDD2ZhpM4RTijU8pqUWHknIkYdMjl5421MvRj7ETNaROP gsz+zHScOVL94b0MpmpFP2zhB1U+90frWmXU3CmRzSpB9e17OpHPzk/4ZduHHzbp8jK5 J31jz4v+lwmjpEKmq2XLvztqtNyOHb3PYZt2mDr/dfRqBw0pe0rGNuAWL1+DsZQcA/x0 Nd2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.s=mail header.b=q+xGnSja; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=sipsolutions.net Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 73-20020a63034c000000b00478446557b9si3752722pgd.677.2022.12.01.00.00.20; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.s=mail header.b=q+xGnSja; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=sipsolutions.net Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229970AbiLAH7A (ORCPT + 68 others); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 02:59:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36572 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229658AbiLAH6Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 02:58:24 -0500 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 144C5AE7D for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 23:57:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=ow8C1FqQ2+KSeNUY/9D0bM7AIYgRt3TKkgCpElpsLkU=; t=1669881460; x=1671091060; b=q+xGnSjaWUKYjFfTD/3hhIwHeWSepU1izJGLDGaK3uAyqVL sGos98/V7Yn+uyKw3bQffDRcmlariAAU91+Sdq30D1Wl572KRZq7/rHc2/+5CDwcYEnP9fPXuNQKI GQAmN6vHVUI2UZCnQmuOx9CkhONjrvu0XMd/YYX0CabP0EDIsOC391O/B+G2irRQlX6hIxHs1DUMv THDo7+4k5QjKFG7wy94WvwITj1rShH81eNE+pPSQftwYpIDGyx2CQ9j4rm5MijpSPZocLl8HnySx+ CXx31OwT1i1oQob3pL/u6JyGpCg7scWTcj8rZWszfnEzTMvJAyxi0faqXC9ybu1g==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1p0eRs-00DygG-2o; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:57:37 +0100 Message-ID: <80556c56e69405d7c8f8bc3d57e2ba697074c660.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: every other wireless scan shows bogus (too low) signal strengths From: Johannes Berg To: Bruno Dantas , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:57:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4 (3.44.4-2.fc36) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 16:19 -0500, Bruno Dantas wrote: > I have an X230 ThinkPad with coreboot and Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC > 7265 card, which uses the iwlwifi kernel module. Module's wifi power > saving is off (the default setting). >=20 > When I scan for wifi hotspots at the command line, every other scan > gives me bogus (too low) signal strengths and every other scan gives > me expected signal strengths: > [...] > Does anyone know why this happens and how to fix it so that every scan sh= ows the expected signal strengths? >=20 I think this NIC might be switching antennas for scan every time. If you're able to open it, it might be a good idea to check if they're both connected well, almost seems like one might not be connected quite correctly? Not sure I have any better idea. You could record debug data with trace-cmd [1] and then at least we could confirm this is the case. johannes [1] https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/iwlwifi/debugging#tracing