Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Authenticated-By: 
From:   Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To:     Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
        "Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com" <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>,
        "kvalo@kernel.org" <kvalo@kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under
 spin_lock_irqsave()
Thread-Index: AQHZCknMh5bOyluekkWY/C/aux+hXK5jJXAA
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2022 00:38:04 +0000
Message-ID: <0cfea9eaf08446d5a7dfcb85da34dcf2@realtek.com>
References: <20221207143738.67721-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221207143738.67721-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW
Content-Language: zh-TW
x-kse-attachmentfiltering-interceptor-info: no applicable attachment filtering
 rules found
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: =?us-ascii?Q?Clean,_bases:_2022/12/7_=3F=3F_10:00:00?=
x-kse-bulkmessagesfiltering-scan-result: protection disabled
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE,
        SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 10:38 PM
> To: Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com; kvalo@kernel.org
> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
> 
> It is not allowed to call consume_skb() from hardware interrupt context
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ kfree_skb()? 
because this patch is to replace dev_kfree_skb().

> or with interrupts being disabled. So replace dev_kfree_skb() with
> dev_consume_skb_irq() under spin_lock_irqsave(). Compile tested only.
> 
> Fixes: 26f1fad29ad9 ("New driver: rtl8xxxu (mac80211)")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> index ac641a56efb0..d0600af5bef4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> @@ -5274,7 +5274,7 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_queue_rx_urb(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv,
>  		pending = priv->rx_urb_pending_count;
>  	} else {
>  		skb = (struct sk_buff *)rx_urb->urb.context;
> -		dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> +		dev_consume_skb_irq(skb);

Why not dev_kfree_skb_irq() instead? any reason?

>  		usb_free_urb(&rx_urb->urb);
>  	}
> 
> --
> 2.25.1
> 
> 
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.