Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Authenticated-By: 
From:   Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     "tony0620emma@gmail.com" <tony0620emma@gmail.com>,
        "kvalo@kernel.org" <kvalo@kernel.org>,
        "tehuang@realtek.com" <tehuang@realtek.com>,
        "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] rtw88: Use non-atomic rtw_iterate_stas() in rtw_ra_mask_info_update()
Thread-Topic: [PATCH 4/4] rtw88: Use non-atomic rtw_iterate_stas() in
 rtw_ra_mask_info_update()
Thread-Index: AQHZGsFuDJ0s6Ba8rkOgPtvNKrTJ9K6EnVFQ
Date:   Thu, 29 Dec 2022 09:39:24 +0000
Message-ID: <b4a237a786dc46fab383aab3c26cac60@realtek.com>
References: <20221228133547.633797-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
 <20221228133547.633797-5-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221228133547.633797-5-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW
Content-Language: zh-TW
x-kse-attachmentfiltering-interceptor-info: no applicable attachment filtering
 rules found
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: =?us-ascii?Q?Clean,_bases:_2022/12/29_=3F=3F_07:25:00?=
x-kse-bulkmessagesfiltering-scan-result: protection disabled
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE,
        SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 9:36 PM
> To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: tony0620emma@gmail.com; kvalo@kernel.org; Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>; tehuang@realtek.com;
> s.hauer@pengutronix.de; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Martin Blumenstingl
> <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] rtw88: Use non-atomic rtw_iterate_stas() in rtw_ra_mask_info_update()
> 
> USB and (upcoming) SDIO support may sleep in the read/write handlers.
> Use non-atomic rtw_iterate_stas() in rtw_ra_mask_info_update() because
> the iterator function rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter() needs to read and
> write registers from within rtw_update_sta_info(). Using the non-atomic
> iterator ensures that we can sleep during USB and SDIO register reads
> and writes. This fixes "scheduling while atomic" or "Voluntary context
> switch within RCU read-side critical section!" warnings as seen by SDIO
> card users (but it also affects USB cards).
> 
> Fixes: 78d5bf925f30 ("wifi: rtw88: iterate over vif/sta list non-atomically")
> Suggested-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
> index 776a9a9884b5..3b92ac611d3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
> @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
>  	br_data.rtwdev = rtwdev;
>  	br_data.vif = vif;
>  	br_data.mask = mask;
> -	rtw_iterate_stas_atomic(rtwdev, rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter, &br_data);
> +	rtw_iterate_stas(rtwdev, rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter, &br_data);
>  }
> 
>  static int rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> @@ -746,7 +746,9 @@ static int rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>  {
>  	struct rtw_dev *rtwdev = hw->priv;
> 
> +	mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
>  	rtw_ra_mask_info_update(rtwdev, vif, mask);
> +	mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
> 
>  	return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.39.0