Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221229124845.1155429-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
 <20221229124845.1155429-3-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> <70d276b911fbf3d77baf2fbd7d5a8716a01f6c2a.camel@realtek.com>
In-Reply-To: <70d276b911fbf3d77baf2fbd7d5a8716a01f6c2a.camel@realtek.com>
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 16:43:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFBinCD-ygjiGuqMgHEBjfr_U67JrqHE7oxNGvT5zhCtgetK7g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtw88: Configure the registers from rtw_bf_assoc()
 outside the RCU lock
To:     Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc:     "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kvalo@kernel.org" <kvalo@kernel.org>,
        "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        "tony0620emma@gmail.com" <tony0620emma@gmail.com>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Ping-Ke,

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:48 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
[...]
> > Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
>
> I think my reviewed-by should behind your signed-off-by.
My understanding is that I have to put your Reviewed-by above my
Signed-off-by since I added the Reviewed-by to the description.
If the maintainer adds your Reviewed-by while applying the patch to
the tree they will put your Reviewed-by between my Signed-off-by and
the maintainer's Signed-off-by.

If this is incorrect then please let me know and I'll change it for v3.


Best regards,
Martin