Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc:     Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath9k: Don't mark channelmap stack variable
 read-only in ath9k_mci_update_wlan_channels()
In-Reply-To: <f4939cb3-bc01-c9e1-aac9-2adb554bc3c4@leemhuis.info>
References: <20230413214118.153781-1-toke@toke.dk>
 <87v8hysrzx.fsf@kernel.org> <87bkjqzrdm.fsf@toke.dk>
 <87edom7i6i.fsf@kernel.org> <877cu9wl7r.fsf@toke.dk>
 <87zg74v5cy.fsf@kernel.org>
 <f4939cb3-bc01-c9e1-aac9-2adb554bc3c4@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:24:53 +0200
Message-ID: <87edoetyve.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> writes:

> [CCing Jakub, Greg and the regressions list]
>
> On 19.04.23 06:54, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes:
>>=20
>>>>> Anyway, cf the bugzilla
>
> [FWIW, it's this ticket Toke meant:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217286 ]
>
>>>>> this was a pretty bad regression for 6.2, so
>>>>> would be good to move this along reasonably quickly (although I guess=
 we
>>>>> just missed the -net PR for rc7)...
>>>>
>>>> I'm not planning to send anymore stuff to v6.3 so my plan is to take
>>>> this to -next. The merge window is very close anyway so this shouldn't
>>>> cause too much delay.
>>>
>>> Hmm, okay, a bit unfortunate that we'll ship 6.3 with the same bug
>>=20
>> Yeah, it is unfortunate.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> But it is always a question of time :) To save
>> time I usually try to send two wireless tree pull requests per cycle,
>> one early in the cycle and the second around the middle.
>
> Why not ask Linus to pull this directly from the list then? He doesn't
> mind doing that for an occasional regression fix. And then he can decide
> himself if the change is worth the risk -- and obviously can take into
> account if he'll release and rc8 or not.

I'm OK with doing it that way; I'll do so later tonight unless Kalle or
Jakub complains before then...

-Toke