Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp4343618rwr; Mon, 8 May 2023 06:31:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6T8re9JfCAbSwtaiMFrpjqrWqNnYkEydJ7ye6wPs2c8ioF5Uc8AfRa3XuRi3taS/C1rqxf X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c94b:b0:1ab:675:3e0c with SMTP id i11-20020a170902c94b00b001ab06753e0cmr13916154pla.33.1683552684132; Mon, 08 May 2023 06:31:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1683552684; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tA4gFe/flYOV52qxwssskH64cL/m/LqES2RSwJ6gQmCU6YPbrK/EFCioWW0YDpjbxE ddsPvFREIy2yturMez80BaKuNaXKAnLIePWZ9QuV6rW2Oml/RN49vjINAwq8BskHaKom Ucuw6Wwi5fGGkHScQXNEzgpSTFqyaRSc7Lb/msaYJAV15sNdQs036dohr7DWh0+9Vkim gMHA4Bt3eSTOvLAHFS3xpY5WoOLOonAAFV6+HUsAq+EH27R61pNmIWWz9UdGV5kH7TLK EXUWxWuSR+vficCendRLr9Pn1V/4pCt9uUjb1gT+fLtPq+nO9YWsV1Oz6MxhlbbATs4c 3GPw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :authorized-sender; bh=sUJihYHxAb64nFOvJrGpp02+Jy1/8VGoUtqSTFLX6iQ=; b=gOPkRatruQgJLe8jWeUMKts52Gxnm6o5Q04UO5Fl2lxTtwhm5TDHezCwhPGGaGPPYT vud41Ghje+26HmJHY9zmdqvSU3sHCg+3XqS1lAaaEFLuI9JZVzAotY8/3/xmXkoPCNwx rbJyZcqiJvHw1sJ+oWCFl8tYapXfZj4ckASoHEjE2MTiu6fGMpbW8SrKuJ2VbGp14KF5 UGaiwrxpUPQhcfIy+KogQmxm8O9Fv/NIez9QXJpdyYyl13BJ3AbcAQIFvbuUUxjNbooV z6nKaprf8j2wQ6gB1TxloDkUusVup/pn6mBF8p16jeqrOjjRLAEu2IKJ3/QGUUUAimEY 3dxw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3-20020a170902da8300b001a99b965c47si8824698plx.411.2023.05.08.06.31.05; Mon, 08 May 2023 06:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234262AbjEHN33 (ORCPT + 61 others); Mon, 8 May 2023 09:29:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46820 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234283AbjEHN3T (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2023 09:29:19 -0400 Received: from bin-mail-out-05.binero.net (bin-mail-out-05.binero.net [195.74.38.228]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A412BCD1 for ; Mon, 8 May 2023 06:29:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Halon-ID: 4b80ee04-eda4-11ed-b7d6-cf458ee68324 Authorized-sender: petter@technux.se Received: from localhost.localdomain (user33.85-195-12.netatonce.net [85.195.12.33]) by bin-vsp-out-03.atm.binero.net (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 4b80ee04-eda4-11ed-b7d6-cf458ee68324; Mon, 08 May 2023 15:29:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Petter Mabacker To: s.hauer@pengutronix.de Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, petter@technux.se, pkshih@realtek.com, tony0620emma@gmail.com Subject: Re: rtw88: rtw8822cu (LM842) -> failed to get tx report from firmware Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 15:29:01 +0200 Message-Id: <20230508132901.44137-1-petter@technux.se> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230411124836.GM19113@pengutronix.de> References: <20230411124836.GM19113@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org I'm working with a Linux 6.1 based track, but with all the mentioned bug fixes cherry-picked to that track. They have all made the LM842 a lot more stabile, but the issue I see with "tx report failed" is currently blocking me from using the LM842, since the mender upgrade is a crucial part for my use-case. I have been trying to find a better way to reproduce the issue, without any success so far. For me it takes just 10-30 sec with above mention flooding using iperf to at least trigger a similar case. ... [ 671.908527] rtw_8822cu 1-1:1.2: failed to get rx_queue, overflow [ 671.914632] rtw_8822cu 1-1:1.2: failed to get rx_queue, overflow [ 671.920750] rtw_8822cu 1-1:1.2: failed to get rx_queue, overflow [ 671.926792] rtw_8822cu 1-1:1.2: failed to get rx_queue, overflow [ 671.932924] rtw_8822cu 1-1:1.2: failed to get rx_queue, overflow [ 694.709045] rtw_8822cu 1-1:1.2: failed to get tx report from firmware [ 710.169496] rtw_8822cu 1-1:1.2: firmware failed to report density after scan [ 717.701235] rtw_8822cu 1-1:1.2: failed to send h2c command I can also mention that I'm running this in a i.MX6 SoloX based board. I will let you guys know if I find a better way to reproduce the issue. But if you have any good ideas what above error (that brings down the entire interface) really mean (for example does it indicate kernel or firmware issue), please feel free to share some information about it and it might help me in troubleshooting the issue further. BR Petter