Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 11:28:34 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Toke =?UTF-8?B?SMO4aWxhbmQtSsO4cmdlbnNlbg==?= <toke@kernel.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: Closing down the wireless trees for a summer break?
Message-ID: <20230613112834.7df36e95@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <871qifxm9b.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <87y1kncuh4.fsf@kernel.org>
        <871qifxm9b.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:14:40 +0200 Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote:
> I think this sounds reasonable, and I applaud the effort to take some
> time off during the summer :)
>=20
> One question that comes to mind is how would this work for patchwork?
> Would we keep using the wireless patchwork instance for the patches
> going to -net in that period, or will there be some other process for
> this? I realise the setup we have for ath9k is a bit special in this
> regard with the ack-on-list+delegation, so I'm obviously mostly
> interested in what to do about that... :)

Whatever's easiest :) It's probably a good idea for Kalle to write
down all the local rules and customs and share those with us.