Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <ba933d6e3d360298e400196371e37735aef3b1eb.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: Closing down the wireless trees for a summer break?
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@kernel.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:00:35 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20230613112834.7df36e95@kernel.org>
References: <87y1kncuh4.fsf@kernel.org> <871qifxm9b.fsf@toke.dk>
         <20230613112834.7df36e95@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.3 (3.48.3-1.fc38) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 11:28 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:14:40 +0200 Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote=
:
> > I think this sounds reasonable, and I applaud the effort to take some
> > time off during the summer :)
> >=20
> > One question that comes to mind is how would this work for patchwork?
> > Would we keep using the wireless patchwork instance for the patches
> > going to -net in that period, or will there be some other process for
> > this? I realise the setup we have for ath9k is a bit special in this
> > regard with the ack-on-list+delegation, so I'm obviously mostly
> > interested in what to do about that... :)
>=20
> Whatever's easiest :) It's probably a good idea for Kalle to write
> down all the local rules and customs and share those with us.
>=20

While that's probably a good idea regardless, I'd think that patchwork
doesn't really matter that much - we'll have some catching up to do
anyway after the vacations, so looking through patchwork etc. would be
perfectly acceptable. Worst case we'd notice when a patch doesn't apply,
right? :)

Wrt. ath9k patches I guess "delegate in patchwork" won't work anymore,
but "resend to netdev" or something perhaps?

johannes