Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <b7c6a794-8d6f-c380-7f39-0c9f60e6642c@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:33:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [regression] STP on 80211s is broken in 6.4-rc4
Content-Language: en-US, de-DE
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
        Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
        Nicolas Escande <nico.escande@gmail.com>, nbd@nbd.name,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Toke_H=c3=b8iland-J=c3=b8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
References: <CT5GNZSK28AI.2K6M69OXM9RW5@syracuse> <ZIQbs0wqdRh7c0Kx@debian.me>
 <a9d02800-2cd6-a27b-7998-4c97cf2eb692@leemhuis.info>
 <CTDWJJDKSYYD.XBG1CAZB3A5W@syracuse>
 <50f7f64c-fe32-4362-fd4e-89ee99c4f581@leemhuis.info>
 <b33d3dd1-9765-c90e-4408-941e7d8025cf@gmail.com>
From:   "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" 
        <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Reply-To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
In-Reply-To: <b33d3dd1-9765-c90e-4408-941e7d8025cf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 16.06.23 14:17, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 6/16/23 16:25, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> On 16.06.23 09:45, Nicolas Escande wrote:
>>> On Thu Jun 15, 2023 at 2:54 PM CEST, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>>>> On 10.06.23 08:44, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:55:57PM +0200, Nicolas Escande wrote:
>>
>>>> Hmmm, Felix did not reply. But let's ignore that for now.
>>> I haven't seen mails from felix on the list for a few days, I'm guessing he's
>>> unavailable for now but I'll hapilly wait.
>>
>> Okay.
>>
>>>> Nicolas, I noticed there are a few patches in next that refer to the
>>>> culprit. Might be worth giving this series a try:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230314095956.62085-1-nbd@nbd.name/
>>> Well this series already landed in 6.4 and that is the version I did my initial
>>> testing with. So no luck there.
>>
>> What? Ohh, sorry for the noise, I had missed that they were in mainline
>> already.
> 
> Should this be removed from tracking as inconclusive?

Ehh, why? Afaics this is still a regression, just not one the reporter
considers urgent; that is fine for me, unless more people start to
report the problem.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.