Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <00d9ec8a-5a44-01ec-a51f-ac898152e22c@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2023 10:30:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: Fwd: After kernel 6.3.7 or 6.3.8 b43 driver fails
Content-Language: en-US, de-DE
To:     Sardonimous <sardonimous@hotmail.com>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
        Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_B=c3=bcsch?= <m@bues.ch>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
References: <27829c69-515c-36a6-4beb-3210225f8936@gmail.com>
 <b9428e48-f0f9-46f6-892c-4c8834c930c4@app.fastmail.com>
 <RO2P215MB193850DDADD38492BEC8CC2FA720A@RO2P215MB1938.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <a3bc5eb5-9639-8016-36ab-105abc8c0ca3@gmail.com>
 <69b98eb4-2c4e-fe75-90b4-4b08505a595a@lwfinger.net>
 <RO2P215MB193879B2D99DD0BAF59EFA92A721A@RO2P215MB1938.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <e0a08449-554a-4a28-ac50-7051866eb95e@app.fastmail.com>
 <da80b806-de3f-c7ea-0352-cd23e0f6dd65@lwfinger.net>
 <RO2P215MB1938BD13105900F3525E0FE7A721A@RO2P215MB1938.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <67faf4f4-f36c-3ff7-03b8-cd259e4a5548@lwfinger.net>
 <RO2P215MB1938BA68BBB683EC696F4BFAA726A@RO2P215MB1938.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <6afa0ebc-1d3f-8cba-79dc-8ddfe13c296a@lwfinger.net>
 <RO2P215MB193898F3008E0F390CCEBC87A726A@RO2P215MB1938.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <89429625-5b5a-d0d3-ae82-0b7204262980@lwfinger.net>
 <RO2P215MB19383189863E11A1B242E02BA729A@RO2P215MB1938.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From:   "Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)" 
        <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Reply-To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
In-Reply-To: <RO2P215MB19383189863E11A1B242E02BA729A@RO2P215MB1938.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 03.07.23 22:13, Sardonimous wrote:
> On 7/3/23 12:35 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
>> Sorry that it took so long to get back to you.
>>
>> For my ppc32, there is no regression. It took a while to learn the
>> pio=1 and qos=0 are BOTH needed. That I do not understand, but with
>> both set, the device works with kernel 6.4 and all earlier kernels
>> that I tried. Fortunately, I did not need to do the entire bisection.
>>
>> I am working on eliminating the warning that appears with qos=0, but
>> it does not inhibit operations.
>>
>> @Bagas Sanjaya: Please mark this "regression" as invalid.
>>
>> Larry
>>
> I appreciate the time you've spent on this. 

Yeah, thx from my side, too.

#regzbot invalid: wasn't a regression after all
#regzbot ignore-activity

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.