Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230723070741.1544662-1-pinkperfect2021@gmail.com>
 <ZMGO3r44oOtMck7S@google.com> <87ila528c3.fsf@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <87ila528c3.fsf@kernel.org>
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:13:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+ASDXO6yTkVfA_GaJZLJYcZo=MU3f1uVm1tZBdS6vTT6x1mOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] wifi: mwifiex: Fix OOB and integer underflow when rx packets
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc:     Polaris Pi <pinkperfect2021@gmail.com>, matthewmwang@chromium.org,
        kuba@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:10=E2=80=AFPM Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrot=
e:
>
> Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> writes:
> > Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
>
> I'm nitpicking but now that you (Brian) are a maintainer I would prefer
> that you use Acked-by instead of Reviewed-by. Patchwork shows the
> statistics (A/R/T in the web ui) and then it's easy for me to see that
> the patch is ready to be applied. This is for the future, no need to
> change anything here.

Argh, I knew that's the recommendation, and I thought I did that here,
but obviously not. Thanks for the reminder. I'm sure I'll fix my
muscle memory eventually :)

Brian