Received: by 2002:a05:6358:c692:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id fe18csp5735276rwb; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 07:15:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlHAgDLFuUH3GCKpPIFofkLQ2a3BqaOcnIMbTZuam0Fx5jP50kB5TvnYiQQa1uf4snx3OixQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fc8c:b0:263:f5fa:cf1b with SMTP id ci12-20020a17090afc8c00b00263f5facf1bmr10324221pjb.30.1690899335229; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 07:15:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1690899335; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DMk8iSVMsEO4ReQmpZW56/rsXnpvI5Ky/AtBa9FQ/SN5vd/vlwbfK7ZDGRtMMZdEjA RfkW4lAagXksx0rkptIvLra9swCN4Gc7RUOWfaOp8RMTS8b3BjbnAFeiH3jRLJA3sx15 okdLsUV24oH131pQAKuZdGK+QX8OCCJ3BUcJ369XOf5sTLe/aCcsjyEC15HGuBzaGjRB Fzyd8+eprXF6XOd0TduJuz3Nfk5SH9eRNuLQfvGFUF6nQ8XSH3zpPXIMTZC/0NV7EAzo pxCi3X6V/QZplDCO6XRRAF9CNXzVwTsFWry2HtuMzjOexLIUo4A6+0S60lft1a11FkTx uvCQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to :date:references:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=mGlfhF1qOEoOuV9IkXnbNzrM69ZoCA5oP04VGWp39RM=; fh=yqTojcVfqZtB9hX9ygIqcWDEXa9uFhygRY09KB+gwms=; b=zcKYWVOfm+EPAqia3ncuEYFYHWve0yR5gWda49QoPMjXnv3mi5bSr+ekOpYtO1saqM S6JCGFQrTs+9DS+VRrNhd8mYj0JobHgP1S7hhCLACRE3OGGNSAmRZeZt1BH7u+SsSYwI IjXEVJomMvv3MhjjyesERZe2Zwb2OremH6CVsrjC0izshPpXhWg/e4C1CcUaDCupDS7H 7z3mXisz5j8MTqzC3idwulSG+T4DA0Alaz3Z0fJib8rw4skfIhGj4jJKc15S1T1ZXghS fTihoVeLDtrM9Q246emSgYf/2KXrGFD9ek8+Xm1+iv+affTdexM5MiYCEakM/zxodh6e 8S7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Ie3j8jUW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q11-20020a17090a2dcb00b002637d779bf3si10838376pjm.17.2023.08.01.07.15.26; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 07:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Ie3j8jUW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234393AbjHANje (ORCPT + 59 others); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 09:39:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45682 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234389AbjHANjc (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 09:39:32 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CAA61BDB for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 06:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 327B56158A for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 13:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E43CC433C7; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 13:39:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1690897169; bh=9kGsbzX/hI4Xz6O0zEgqDeojgA8+ngAxvzHsSUzt1d0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ie3j8jUW0b06u3Ro/4D5ZrACxBDRm26lemeICO7Y2DCkajeXaZtWdK3UYhAY7pZq3 dgBU+/GgrcOUnuWcHtc3QidiPkwvfG1kWiKoCsfBRpHSHZoyv7FJcxEV8icUJjO2RZ fVBqrYXI2G015/jnnObwYs7bto/q1mGB4WmyGdz+GZPAdTkd5ShT5lR1jzLrzLeFDB qjKFzFdJHexSU+TAcOEFANoyYLao5d2of8BR4be6AwdjNjAyAZ7j/ZDQTXBt3vwWyf zuayySg0AFZITpSrsJlHC6u8oFEQs6YkXi8hl+xe0zqEOY3ZHe/8X8yYStOBNUCG5Y 9xcTiX8XvOg4Q== From: Kalle Valo To: Dmitry Antipov Cc: Doug Brown , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, lvc-project@linuxtesting.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] wifi: libertas: add missing calls to cancel_work_sync() References: <20230724084457.64995-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru> <87cz0h3d1q.fsf@kernel.org> <87r0onxdra.fsf@kernel.org> <0368ccdc-74f4-6ec1-1b7d-cfb5ebfd479d@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 16:39:26 +0300 In-Reply-To: <0368ccdc-74f4-6ec1-1b7d-cfb5ebfd479d@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:47:11 +0300") Message-ID: <87mszayj8x.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Dmitry Antipov writes: > On 8/1/23 13:23, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Another problem I see that you don't always reply to review comments and >> that gives an impression that the comments are ignored. Please always >> try to reply something to the review comments, even if just a simple >> "ok" or "I don't agree because...". > > Looking through my e-mails for the previous month, I was unable to find an > unanswered review. Could you please provide an example? I'll fix it > ASAP. You have sent so many patches and I don't have time to start go through them. Maybe I noticed that with some of mwifiex patches, not sure. But that doesn't matter, I just hope that in the future you reply to comments. > I don't want to speculate around the workflow of others and realize > that someone (especially the maintainer) may be overloaded and too > busy. OTOH it's not quite clear why the trivial things like > https://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=169030215701718&w=2 stalls for > almost a week. Should I consider this as "ignored" too? A delay of week is business as usual, I have patches in queue which are from last October: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=684424&state=* Remember that this is not a 24/7 service and we just had a summer break. I have 160 patches in patchwork right so expect long delays but you can check the status from patchwork yourself: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#checking_state_of_patches_from_patchwork -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches