Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <022650a5-103a-c6b7-a84c-2597179c5b98@yandex.ru>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:04:22 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230731074334.56463-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru>
 <ZMlOn7VqW2Ds30XO@google.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mwifiex: fix error recovery in PCIE buffer
 descriptor management
In-Reply-To: <ZMlOn7VqW2Ds30XO@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 8/1/23 21:27, Brian Norris wrote:

> I'm not sure that's truly an appropriate "Fixes" target, as that commit
> just shuffled the existing bad code around. I'd either remove that line,
> or else also add:
> 
> Fixes: d930faee141b ("mwifiex: add support for Marvell pcie8766 chipset")
> 
> where the buggy stuff was first introduced.
> 
> I don't think you need to resubmit just for this; Kalle can usually make
> small adjustments like this when applying. And even if not, the issue is
> trivial.

I have some more PCIe bits; would it be better to submit them separately or
create a series (of 3 patches I think) and make this one a part of the series?

Dmitry