Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <30ad9d872e0555d801e9b22c9a72edb0f62a61a6.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: parsing the multi-link element with STA profile wifi: mac80211:
 support MLO authentication/association with one link
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
        Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:19:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: <b5de662d-fd49-7b94-f617-89d4761c175b@quicinc.com>
References: <48715509-62fd-2307-e38f-176234b482c1@quicinc.com>
         <f240b33d507daf898480b0a11eb27d4475e45164.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <571d8ecf-2ca6-8b7b-6e15-be12c56e9f88@quicinc.com>
         <e40ee96ab2a8d9d079d3a06b7b1c615ab25a2403.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <2842f57c-e383-fb9e-d994-95336cb65e0d@quicinc.com>
         <6a33a41b5aa6c98d95ff934fbb6a10dfe78e6e6e.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <2d3a6578-68c5-a0f3-b18b-bce2e67d3fdc@quicinc.com>
         <b5de662d-fd49-7b94-f617-89d4761c175b@quicinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 14:30 +0800, Wen Gong wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>=20
> I guess you have already fix it in some patch, right?
>=20

No, I don't. We've not seen this, it's not been a priority.

<rant>

Look, I told you how I think you can fix it _literally_ three months
ago. I was on vacation for pretty much exactly half of that time. And
during that time you ask if _I_ have a fix? What have you been doing for
the past three months that prevented you from fixing it?

Upstream is supposed to be a collaborative effort, not a place where
I/we do the work and you keep asking me to make the changes you need for
you!

Sure, it there's a bug, and we should probably be fixing it  too, but if
that's not high on our list right now because we don't experience it,
then I don't see why you don't just send a patch!

I even get that you might not know whether something is a bug, and when
we determine that it is, how to fix it. But we cleared that up three
months ago, and all you've done in this thread is ask whether I have a
fix for you. Why?

johannes