Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <cc6b83eb-ac30-34fc-4827-290a9ae25378@quicinc.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:05:16 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.14.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 61/76] wifi: nl80211: add EML/MLD capabilities to
 per-iftype capabilities
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <ath12k@lists.infradead.org>, <quic_rkaliapp@quicinc.com>
References: <20220713094502.163926-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
 <20220713114426.4dfc9ebd0461.Ice7b841051cfeb23da17bb2caa0e45191b34c4db@changeid>
 <d2f17799-6d90-9d72-a389-565163d723d2@quicinc.com>
 <f577425e2d4fd6141c29bcbfbea919565da9326d.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <f577425e2d4fd6141c29bcbfbea919565da9326d.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 8/11/2023 5:03 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 11:51 +0800, Wen Gong wrote:
>> Now there are many nl80211_band such as NL80211_BAND_2GHZ/
>> NL80211_BAND_5GHZ/NL80211_BAND_6GHZ... In the same interface, if some bands
>> support EML, and other bands not support EML, then how to handler this
>> case?
> But ... these are MLD capabilities, not of the (associated) STA?
Yes, I know it.
>
> So not sure how that would make sense? What would you even _do_ with
> that?
I think another change is not move "u16 eml_capabilities", and only add 
a new
field "u16 eml_supp_bands" together with the "u16 eml_capabilities", the
eml_supp_bands is filled with the bit map of enum nl80211_band. Is that OK?
>
> johannes