Received: by 2002:a05:7412:2a8c:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id u12csp1033289rdh; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:41:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEOEBFYmBWxEDild/EsZbJFcbgMrEkC4AwSTAGAlP0rC8MTiQJr4npkym8vGTlUqWq7hfXT X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:2495:b0:143:5180:1700 with SMTP id m21-20020a056358249500b0014351801700mr7569422rwc.27.1695627701157; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:41:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1695627701; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0t7LuBXgUVXhFzEHUzLhDrC8YA2Zno3+JMQjjPuvFs6MPB+k3ohu3bq1tPCW73l+b7 ZHQCniwoL3qhpGqJrbpLY/7DhLxLT9bl3Ho6NKzl1R1b1129tT7aS5hjhjzSlUQag7sH dV/EbW1/+n3eCuXqUb8NCYv44nXGldwLwoKMNBRHP/wO8FB9lu6wJaaElIT13kS60fIg QAa6D0clee9BIMFPmfSYtnmdZVczgQd28aR1xkIVct55QzCMBa+oYEWGkmWUqAR6Ad/f 6WgB/Iamy8tRr/km7JgQpC8pS0DETGpv2RzWTFxOr8acDl01M2NaxSi8KdPMcv9Pkb1Z 1nUw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:date:to:from :subject:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=mUEtdsdi5l9p1Tkurxb/UUSNB97kEQMrvAebiAr0dtU=; fh=qpt37YV7dYKiUmkfHHsrHlJ9kqL8dW2HrQkD2K5Wn7I=; b=GTfcV4uaABpC3gszsnr7wyjgl/D12qu5Cs49DKeVYa+4uLLF0kWRRHpRvKj2UgACIa viJSDVf4LO8VrBOKN9iNgHqtWOSu9+wC8Z1nQvjbl/8Fm5uvlZ8MU0/+fb4uJzU1k18I xi0ryKO0Pss7hXA6jPnzM9Hmg8M+gXGKEAoZO/YmlW5r/VxYQcC4KAb4VEDranee523s SWYiB7jTnCiRRzV51+i9tFpY1T/e7f12Y6zzqjeIq+elP+yTfX/3jl06W+MKLr4mGcQG xRTlFoiqqN/Lp5w9axovnmcequLJepDqwEceecEi8DiiKXtCmxMiNoWA9xHHCV76n28i MfPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.s=mail header.b=Mkr8iNZt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=sipsolutions.net Return-Path: Received: from snail.vger.email (snail.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i67-20020a636d46000000b0056fa1bc208esi9241554pgc.722.2023.09.25.00.41.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.s=mail header.b=Mkr8iNZt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=sipsolutions.net Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by snail.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1C3806138A; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:17:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at snail.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229619AbjIYHR6 (ORCPT + 56 others); Mon, 25 Sep 2023 03:17:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54996 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229459AbjIYHR6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2023 03:17:58 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:242:246e::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8506BB8 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:17:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=mUEtdsdi5l9p1Tkurxb/UUSNB97kEQMrvAebiAr0dtU=; t=1695626271; x=1696835871; b=Mkr8iNZtqzh5GO61H4sZJK0uENb5l6vtsu/Z60a5dzLkK+E eKUj6yX8/7WYSLWg+zsF3pb+2npQ2cDczRt0dZB8/TtHd7WN7pGIdebsRijeQyoiGcAguQYBFbvkz iQgT9OeWDgM4tV0tApaEO2Scoc5Nm82YOO4JpJqQt7F6I7RqIpnXty9sqcx4+tfrDG0mLmxP943wD q2hVbcHPLwVVH8SvPFBEKp1IIu7UoIRGgRI/I4aJgq+bku9nPF+/krzbbr53Y2Xex1r+EKw+yewbi kdtP2kZJUu8V9fJvqDvfpd5647qaYd/3s1Q86h+PqSGLGdlKa5I3pSmlntjTwWiQ==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qkfqm-003G6K-25; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:17:48 +0200 Message-ID: <7fd041470156c1e5da921d74c87fccac01aec4a7.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] Additional processing in beacon updates (v8) From: Johannes Berg To: Aloka Dixit , Jeff Johnson , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:17:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <53c81779-d423-c266-c8bd-f9583538c2e5@quicinc.com> References: <20230727174100.11721-1-quic_alokad@quicinc.com> <46340c48-285e-4e2a-b6e9-802f922f0c2c@quicinc.com> <759fb125-7bfc-7d85-5c71-0a134030a9b9@quicinc.com> <6e680b33-55f5-2c49-3458-6baa4d8cff52@quicinc.com> <1912863dcd17aa50b09d1ddfc889478eb323f901.camel@sipsolutions.net> <53c81779-d423-c266-c8bd-f9583538c2e5@quicinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (snail.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:17:54 -0700 (PDT) On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 15:29 -0700, Aloka Dixit wrote: > > Alternatively, maybe we should indeed change the prototype again and > > introduce a new struct cfg80211_ap_update that contains only the > > parameters that change? > >=20 > > That feels a bit harder, but really it isn't by that much - in mac80211 > > ieee80211_set_fils_discovery() etc. already take the sub-parameters > > (¶ms->fils_discovery), so not a problem there, and in nl80211 we > > could as well pass struct cfg80211_fils_discovery directly to > > nl80211_parse_fils_discovery() rather than the entire struct > > cfg80211_ap_settings, which wouldn't be a massive change. > >=20 > >=20 > > I think maybe I even prefer the latter if I'm looking at it now, but I'= m > > not sure I'm not missing something from earlier discussions on this. >=20 > The second option will take couple of weeks due to current work load.=20 Since you didn't seem to be opposed, I just did the second thing myself now, it wasn't really hard. :) johannes