Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
Message-ID: <6522f495.df0a0220.326ed.de6c@mx.google.com>
Date:   Sun, 8 Oct 2023 20:27:28 +0200
From:   Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Chris Snook <chris.snook@gmail.com>,
        Raju Rangoju <rajur@chelsio.com>,
        Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com>,
        Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@google.com>,
        Shailend Chand <shailend@google.com>,
        Douglas Miller <dougmill@linux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>,
        Haren Myneni <haren@linux.ibm.com>,
        Rick Lindsley <ricklind@linux.ibm.com>,
        Dany Madden <danymadden@us.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
        Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>,
        Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>,
        Chandrashekar Devegowda <chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com>,
        Intel Corporation <linuxwwan@intel.com>,
        Chiranjeevi Rapolu <chiranjeevi.rapolu@linux.intel.com>,
        Liu Haijun <haijun.liu@mediatek.com>,
        M Chetan Kumar <m.chetan.kumar@linux.intel.com>,
        Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
        Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Yuanjun Gong <ruc_gongyuanjun@163.com>,
        Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@google.com>,
        Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com>,
        Coco Li <lixiaoyan@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Junfeng Guo <junfeng.guo@intel.com>,
        Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Yuri Karpov <YKarpov@ispras.ru>,
        Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Dawei Li <set_pte_at@outlook.com>,
        Anjaneyulu <pagadala.yesu.anjaneyulu@intel.com>,
        Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 4/4] netdev: use napi_schedule bool instead
 of napi_schedule_prep/__napi_schedule
References: <20231003145150.2498-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20231003145150.2498-4-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <CANn89iLtYZJPOQE7OkAbEdmhT8qjzAJ+27poa__3c8Nf0M6u_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <652056c5.5d0a0220.2b60d.c5dc@mx.google.com>
 <CANn89i+Cie+oE_hTWkyJWutTG9CnPy+dbW+-A97Q+E9Rq-f9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+Cie+oE_hTWkyJWutTG9CnPy+dbW+-A97Q+E9Rq-f9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 09:08:41AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 8:49 PM Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 06:16:26PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:36 PM Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Replace if condition of napi_schedule_prep/__napi_schedule and use bool
> > > > from napi_schedule directly where possible.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atlx/atl1.c     | 4 +---
> > > >  drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/tc35815.c       | 4 +---
> > > >  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c | 4 +---
> > > >  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atlx/atl1.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atlx/atl1.c
> > > > index 02aa6fd8ebc2..a9014d7932db 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atlx/atl1.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atlx/atl1.c
> > > > @@ -2446,7 +2446,7 @@ static int atl1_rings_clean(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> > > >
> > > >  static inline int atl1_sched_rings_clean(struct atl1_adapter* adapter)
> > > >  {
> > > > -       if (!napi_schedule_prep(&adapter->napi))
> > > > +       if (!napi_schedule(&adapter->napi))
> > > >                 /* It is possible in case even the RX/TX ints are disabled via IMR
> > > >                  * register the ISR bits are set anyway (but do not produce IRQ).
> > > >                  * To handle such situation the napi functions used to check is
> > > > @@ -2454,8 +2454,6 @@ static inline int atl1_sched_rings_clean(struct atl1_adapter* adapter)
> > > >                  */
> > > >                 return 0;
> > > >
> > > > -       __napi_schedule(&adapter->napi);
> > > > -
> > > >         /*
> > > >          * Disable RX/TX ints via IMR register if it is
> > > >          * allowed. NAPI handler must reenable them in same
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/tc35815.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/tc35815.c
> > > > index 14cf6ecf6d0d..a8b8a0e13f9a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/tc35815.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/toshiba/tc35815.c
> > > > @@ -1436,9 +1436,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tc35815_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > > >         if (!(dmactl & DMA_IntMask)) {
> > > >                 /* disable interrupts */
> > > >                 tc_writel(dmactl | DMA_IntMask, &tr->DMA_Ctl);
> > > > -               if (napi_schedule_prep(&lp->napi))
> > > > -                       __napi_schedule(&lp->napi);
> > > > -               else {
> > > > +               if (!napi_schedule(&lp->napi)) {
> > > >                         printk(KERN_ERR "%s: interrupt taken in poll\n",
> > > >                                dev->name);
> > > >                         BUG();
> > >
> > > Hmmm... could you also remove this BUG() ? I think this code path can be taken
> > > if some applications are using busy polling.
> > >
> > > Or simply rewrite this with the traditional
> > >
> > > if (napi_schedule_prep(&lp->napi)) {
> > >    /* disable interrupts */
> > >    tc_writel(dmactl | DMA_IntMask, &tr->DMA_Ctl);
> > >     __napi_schedule(&lp->napi);
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Mhhh is it safe to do so? I mean it seems very wrong to print a warning
> > and BUG() instead of disabling the interrupt only if napi can be
> > scheduled... Maybe is very old code? The more I see this the more I see
> > problem... (randomly disabling the interrupt and then make the kernel
> > die)
> 
> I am pretty sure this BUG() can be hit these days with busy polling or
> setting gro_flush_timeout.
> 
> I wish we could remove these bugs before someone copy-paste them.
> 
> Again, this is orthogonal, I might simply stop doing reviews if this
> is not useful.

They are very useful and thanks a lot for them! I'm asking these as to
understand how to proceed. I have in queue 2 other series that depends
on this and I'm just asking info on how to speedup the progress on this!

Soo think I have to send v3 with the suggested change and BUG() dropped?
Happy to do everything to fix and improve this series!

-- 
	Ansuel