Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] hostap: Add __counted_by for struct
 prism2_download_data and use struct_size()
References: <ZSRXXvWMMkm7qqRW@work> <202310091253.665A9C9@keescook>
        <169f782e-9cc4-49bc-9618-ca6acc526e37@embeddedor.com>
        <202310091341.74A2D82BB@keescook>
Date:   Tue, 10 Oct 2023 09:17:34 +0300
In-Reply-To: <202310091341.74A2D82BB@keescook> (Kees Cook's message of "Mon, 9
        Oct 2023 13:42:12 -0700")
Message-ID: <877cnv57cx.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:

>> > Should this be considered a v2 of:
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/94848cc3-6f5c-46d7-8cc7-98a4f10865b3@embeddedor.com/
>> > 
>> > ?
>> 
>> Oops... sorry, I forgot I had reviewed this patch of yours.
>> 
>> > 
>> > Yours is more complete since it includes the struct_size() change...
>> > 
>> 
>> Should I resend this explicitly marking it as a v2?
>
> I defer to Kalle -- your Subject is more accurate, so perhaps let's just
> let this stand?

No need to resend. I marked Kees' version as Superseded so that I don't
accidentally take the wrong version.

In the title "wifi:" is missing but I can add that during commit.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches