Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To:     Arend van Spriel <aspriel@gmail.com>
Cc:     <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFH] wireless-next: fix new W=1 warnings
References: <87fs2k5l1a.fsf@kernel.org>
        <18b3e27d218.279b.9696ff82abe5fb6502268bdc3b0467d4@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 18:31:52 +0300
In-Reply-To: <18b3e27d218.279b.9696ff82abe5fb6502268bdc3b0467d4@gmail.com>
        (Arend van Spriel's message of "Tue, 17 Oct 2023 17:01:19 +0200")
Message-ID: <87a5sh2rkn.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Arend van Spriel <aspriel@gmail.com> writes:

> On October 9, 2023 9:10:11 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> During the weekend we updated wireless-next tree from v6.5 to v6.6-rc4+.
>> It looks like a new warning was enabled for v6.6 as I see with GCC 13.2
>> and W=1 several warnings (list below). In v6.5 wireless code was still
>> W=1 warning free with GCC.
>
> Can't say I am a big fan of this new warning, but I will look at the
> brcmfmac related warnings.

I already sent a patch, please take a look:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20231012135854.3473332-1-kvalo@kernel.org/

> Btw. is it possible to opt out per driver.

Usually that's not preferred.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches