Received: by 2002:a05:7412:8d10:b0:f3:1519:9f41 with SMTP id bj16csp860065rdb; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 01:50:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF19oBlldf9iNuE2voNKIe8bH7Imt8d3G8oxRwjG8DandMY1c6GNQVGwQ7+HP7EEx6o+EEV X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6d8e:0:b0:6d9:c946:49c with SMTP id x14-20020a9d6d8e000000b006d9c946049cmr478496otp.5.1701856224299; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 01:50:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1701856224; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gTyfs9wVnwr85KGmmQ35quOyD0LLjSQvxt6T3il7v41hbJJJn5cZCAtjyImZLiqvDI 66FTVAQmODku6FV5vdCbqWnr6wQ8XzapIA5K81NEtFAcjGMe+wLg3CCP+oL53C75ajM1 Sg05jUHZVS3FztZ2vm6ygvN6ojK2ZSb3frok4WzGjzHbGdPHUYYlNpvl0d/o3eDh4BvW CrWJgha3k3pBRgFxCpMV0E0Q6wZ1jjAhZYV3vwwkdN1VNpMmY9EGdHcBPP3hGWA/Xj0o 0D+WrLHS1wDAi7vPx5B1gK0izYC568GWbO8JDbEPNC3wYLQtVCSwLxLr2VPvFYD9TTK+ AATw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:date:cc :to:from:subject:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=h6JN3D/3YeujwHgCvdr5maM8vVQrlsYw0ga5RvmCUHI=; fh=qtfNEVTFfK6ZyxFN7+f5SbP+ySH4/7tnQFXxIV9jspc=; b=izAoZMj/riz75pJUUbkRF0IoPz57i4RwNCHWcMnJxjNE9a+cFv4UJkGApE8FyryIhE BTkRWKEaoF/x5FuMf7Jihc1c9Qp24iGp7YOxfTTW+9b6cEU1ptOo1979PB9zdDmsScDq 5RsNdJzixBJRbmRVkkzGuFJTb7CjN79bcpTaEGOTD6kdA7M1YXFxvxKelQXOhxj3gNpF wIUrMN1fnODGzhibLT5OPmHgyXq+yDOaNbT/FYDt5JxUZtPBxWLC8ec1/F/nnJhSe7Uv Rad8ceEaIWR9M1nAOM0sMS03rZ6QMvgWpjCKx4dK/ABY7rAkouRHEI1do7qUBUWLL8Ld 6goQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.s=mail header.b=ncQF6jLo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-487-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-wireless+bounces-487-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=sipsolutions.net Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4-20020a63cd04000000b005c663eae37asi7100221pgg.252.2023.12.06.01.50.24 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Dec 2023 01:50:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-487-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.s=mail header.b=ncQF6jLo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-487-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-wireless+bounces-487-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=sipsolutions.net Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D240B281A10 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 09:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61F41C684; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 09:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="ncQF6jLo" X-Original-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:242:246e::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84CC8FA; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 01:50:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=h6JN3D/3YeujwHgCvdr5maM8vVQrlsYw0ga5RvmCUHI=; t=1701856216; x=1703065816; b=ncQF6jLoNwAoBbMiTRG7qGTeiYtv3Vfx9wxXs01nklhNXRn GMjylvJr5zPsmmtCIjw6jLab8HBl3J0NWXjgFCbDyH4rlpHJhTCeR9UouYUT56C+z8s+zziZuZ6An AWCeNiTNY18uNkFZcU8CNyrbPydQkqNrwrEHdr5oXKiuB9mUl357yULjxsnqJ2MSTFnAxOMnIkwan ZpRuZMzCC6DZx/KWsNebAc68S4s2SyiZUu/DvUIFF+qLXfhChVBiwdD6j+qr/zMsqz/8yDsGS8VVz m3R+2FxCTgVwSvq6ElKkqGGoSawt84gPAibkpXYrJwKMaPdDp5bJLM3g51p4gKhw==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rAoXj-0000000HYVR-2XDC; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 10:50:11 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: ethtool: do runtime PM outside RTNL From: Johannes Berg To: Marc MERLIN Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ilw@linux.intel.com, Heiner Kallweit Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 10:50:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20231205231509.GA181276@merlins.org> References: <20231204200710.40c291e60cea.I2deb5804ef1739a2af307283d320ef7d82456494@changeid> <20231204200038.GA9330@merlins.org> <20231204203622.GB9330@merlins.org> <24577c9b8b4d398fe34bd756354c33b80cf67720.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20231204205439.GA32680@merlins.org> <20231204212849.GA25864@merlins.org> <20231205024652.GA12805@merlins.org> <1d986c73c1d39b0cced7d8d2119fba4b2a02418b.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20231205231509.GA181276@merlins.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.1 (3.50.1-1.fc39) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 15:15 -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote: > >=20 > > Power est. Usage Events/s Category Descript= ion > > 24.1 W 59.6 pkts/s Device Network interfac= e: wlp9s0 (iwlwifi) That seems excessive, I'm not sure it's even _possible_ for it to draw that much power? > > The battery reports a discharge rate of 36.1 W >=20 > Obviously unloading iwlwifi fixes it: > > The battery reports a discharge rate of 26.0 W That would put it closer to 10W, but even that seems too much... no idea though. > Is this something I should persue separately on > linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org or ilw@linux.intel.com or elsewhere? >=20 Certainly separately, maybe put a bug on bugzilla per https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/iwlwifi/debugging johannes