Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-1085-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 18:22:33 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
	Arend van Spriel <aspriel@gmail.com>,
	Franky Lin <franky.lin@broadcom.com>,
	Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS: wifi: brcm80211: remove non-existing
 SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@infineon.com
Message-ID: <ZYLOef1s5Ul7uz3_@archie.me>
References: <20231218121105.23882-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
 <170295913267.640718.8284035097366475252.kvalo@kernel.org>
 <18c814f4890.279b.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com>
 <29c3122ca8e4d72c07942d09dca7a0fbd0138024.camel@sipsolutions.net>
 <8734vysbtt.fsf@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x85mmRQAZSrLT8xn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8734vysbtt.fsf@kernel.org>


--x85mmRQAZSrLT8xn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 12:53:18PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:
>=20
> > On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 10:01 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> >> >=20
> >> > > When sending an email to SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@infineon.com, the ser=
ver
> >> > > responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
> >>=20
> >> Is the claim here true? In another thread I replied all including this=
 list=20
> >> and I am not getting a bounce message.
> >
> > I also got the bounce, FWIW. And Lukas is using gmail ... if you're not
> > accepting mail from gmail I'm not sure you get to call it "email" in the
> > 21st century, for (better or) worse...
>=20
> And is Infineon even contributing anything to upstream? At least I don't
> have recollection any recent activity, though happy to be proven wrong.
> We shouldn't have dormant information in MAINTAINERS file.
>=20

I'm also using gmail (and GMX as backup). When I sent my reply about rPI
testing [1] with SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@infineon.com Cc'ed, I got `Address
not found` error instead (but the DSN message was in spam folder instead
as I treated it as junk).

For Infineon, they're now focusing on TPM subsystem, with the latest message
is 6 months (or a semester in academic speak) ago [2].

Thanks.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZYLKftqKFJ_PMmF3@archie.me/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230613180259.3525-4-Alexander.Steffen@i=
nfineon.com/

--=20
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

--x85mmRQAZSrLT8xn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCZYLOdgAKCRD2uYlJVVFO
o98gAP4yOBKMBVs5YC/xxJc9ZWWlDpUX3Hm41puwaNZW55ftNAD/VVzZ/QTjzPv6
9WYs5N9WaXzO/OmTYYMhbWRfDRWpJgQ=
=btd9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--x85mmRQAZSrLT8xn--