Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-1269-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Message-ID: <785436c0080a7a7d20175a45ed671ceaf82cd79b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: Modify the QoS mapping tests
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>, Andrei Otcheretianski
	 <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
Cc: hostap@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ilan Peer
	 <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 18:30:52 +0100
In-Reply-To: <ZYa5CotWy+00CHII@w1.fi>
References: <20231213113735.289408-1-andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
	 <ZYa5CotWy+00CHII@w1.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39) 
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Sat, 2023-12-23 at 12:40 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Andrei Otcheretianski wrote:
> > The cfg80211 default QoS mapping was updated to align
> > with the recommendations in section 4 in RFC8325. Align the QoS
> > mapping test accordingly.
>=20
> Thanks, applied. Though, I changed this to accept both the current
> mac80211 mapping and the one proposed in the patch that has not yet been
> applied.
> =20
Should I take that to mean that you think making the kernel change is
reasonable / makes sense?

johannes