Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-1477-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:11:50 +0200
From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Andrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>,
	hostap@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: Modify the QoS mapping tests
Message-ID: <ZZZ2VijIWptjwzMY@w1.fi>
References: <20231213113735.289408-1-andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
 <ZYa5CotWy+00CHII@w1.fi>
 <785436c0080a7a7d20175a45ed671ceaf82cd79b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <785436c0080a7a7d20175a45ed671ceaf82cd79b.camel@sipsolutions.net>

On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-12-23 at 12:40 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Andrei Otcheretianski wrote:
> > > The cfg80211 default QoS mapping was updated to align
> > > with the recommendations in section 4 in RFC8325. Align the QoS
> > > mapping test accordingly.
> > 
> > Thanks, applied. Though, I changed this to accept both the current
> > mac80211 mapping and the one proposed in the patch that has not yet been
> > applied.
> >  
> Should I take that to mean that you think making the kernel change is
> reasonable / makes sense?

Yes

-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA