Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-1672-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Message-ID: <356e0b05-f396-4ad7-9b29-c492b54af834@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 06:55:23 -0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: ath11k and vfio-pci support
Content-Language: en-US
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org
References: <adcb785e-4dc7-4c4a-b341-d53b72e13467@gmail.com>
 <8734v5zhol.fsf@kernel.org> <87fa5220-6fd9-433d-879b-c55ac67a0748@gmail.com>
 <87r0ipcn7j.fsf@kernel.org>
From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <87r0ipcn7j.fsf@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Kalle,

On 1/10/24 5:49 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> But I have also no idea what is causing this, I guess we are doing
>>> something wrong with the PCI communication? That reminds me, you could
>>> try this in case that helps:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20231212031914.47339-1-imguzh@gmail.com/
>> Heh, I saw this pop up a day after I sent this and was wondering. Is
>> this something I'd need on the host kernel, guest, or both?
> On the guest where ath11k is running. I'm not optimistic that this would
> solve your issue, I suspect there can be also other bugs, but good to
> know if the patch changes anything.

Looks the same here, didn't seem to change anything based on the kernel 
logs.

Thanks,

James