Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-2388-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:35:17 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, abeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
 dsahern@kernel.org, weiwan@google.com, "netdev@vger.kernel.org"
 <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/22] Fix MODULE_DESCRIPTION() for net (p2)
Message-ID: <20240123083517.2982c483@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Za/oeIjnMoqqp4Tt@gmail.com>
References: <20240122184543.2501493-1-leitao@debian.org>
	<20240122105708.52d33fa0@kernel.org>
	<Za/oeIjnMoqqp4Tt@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:25:28 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > When you repost:
> >  - please send these 3 to linux-wireless as a separate series
> >  - make sure mailing lists are CCed on the cover letter
> >    (yes, get_maintainer is embarrassingly bad at its job)
> >  - please send 10 at-a-time, it's probably a good tradeoff
> >    between series size and reposting risk
> >  - please target net, I hope I convinced Paolo that it's okay :)  
> 
> Sure. I will split this series in 3 and target `net`.

The wireless ones need to target wireless, just to be clear.
The rest should fit into 2 series.

> I suppose it is OK to send the patchsets in parallel, instead of waiting
> for the first patchset to be reviewed/accepted before sending the second
> part. Is this correct?

The rate limit is to avoid having to give the same feedback to multiple
series, among other things. it'd be better to send one part at a time..
it won't take that long :)