Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-2467-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	lvc-project@linuxtesting.org,
	Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Re: wifi: mac80211: don't ask rate control with zero rate mask if scanning
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:07:34 +0300
Message-ID: <20240125090737.49673-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <58970b94a314414402a932576ec54188c0675016.camel@sipsolutions.net>
References: <58970b94a314414402a932576ec54188c0675016.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Well, the literal approach to "not even use the bitrate mask for scanning"
may look like the following. It fixes an original WARN_ONCE() as reported
by syzkaller, but I'm definitely interesting on how to check whether it
doesn't break something else.

Dmitry Antipov (1):
  wifi: mac80211: ignore the bitrate mask when scanning

 include/net/mac80211.h | 3 +++
 net/mac80211/rate.c    | 4 +++-
 net/mac80211/scan.c    | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.43.0