Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-4337-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,  Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>,
  Miriam Rachel Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: Adjust CQM handling for MLO
References: <20240228094753.bf6a3fefe553.Id738810b73e1087e01d5885508b70a3631707627@changeid>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:03:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20240228094753.bf6a3fefe553.Id738810b73e1087e01d5885508b70a3631707627@changeid>
	(Johannes Berg's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:47:54 +0100")
Message-ID: <8734t682er.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> From: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
>
> The CQM handling did not consider the MLO case and thus notified
> a not-existing link with the CQM change. To fix this, propagate
> the CQM notification to all the active links (handling both the
> non-MLO and MLO cases).
>
> TODO: this currently propagates the same configuration to all
> links regardless of the band. This might not be the correct
> approach as different links might need to be configured with
> different values.

Is that TODO link there intentionally?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches