Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-5797-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Karthikeyan Periyasamy <quic_periyasa@quicinc.com>
Cc: <ath12k@lists.infradead.org>,  <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] [RESEND] wifi: ath12k: refactor the link capable
 flag
References: <20240403042056.1504209-1-quic_periyasa@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:38:12 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20240403042056.1504209-1-quic_periyasa@quicinc.com> (Karthikeyan
	Periyasamy's message of "Wed, 3 Apr 2024 09:50:54 +0530")
Message-ID: <87o7aq68a3.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Karthikeyan Periyasamy <quic_periyasa@quicinc.com> writes:

> extend the link capable flag to accommodate inter-device capability.
>
> v2:
>  - Rename the terminology from chip to device
>
> Karthikeyan Periyasamy (2):
>   wifi: ath12k: extend the link capable flag
>   wifi: ath12k: fix link capable flags

Why the resend? I'm not really a fan of these "RESEND" versions. If you
need to resend something simply just increase the version number (in
this case to v3) and explain in the change log why you sent v3. That's a
lot more clear for everyone than having "v2", "v2 RESEND", "v2 RESEND
RESEND" and what not. It's not like we are running out of version
numbers ;)

But no need to resend because of this :)

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches