Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-5885-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Message-ID: <1f0ae919-0562-4da0-8218-69cbb21e6068@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:44:40 +0530
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/2] Add Multi-Link Reconfigure link removal support
Content-Language: en-US
To: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>, <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
CC: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20240404185950.776062-1-quic_mdharane@quicinc.com>
 <0ec145b0-b10f-4a89-a905-0bc804403f38@quicinc.com>
From: Manish Dharanenthiran <quic_mdharane@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <0ec145b0-b10f-4a89-a905-0bc804403f38@quicinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


On 4/5/2024 1:07 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> BTW for future reference your subject should contain both PATCH and RFC
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
> "The summary phrase may be prefixed by tags enclosed in square brackets:
> “Subject: [PATCH <tag>...] <summary phrase>”. The tags are not considered part
> of the summary phrase, but describe how the patch should be treated. Common
> tags might include a version descriptor if the multiple versions of the patch
> have been sent out in response to comments (i.e., “v1, v2, v3”), or “RFC” to
> indicate a request for comments."
> 
> 
Sure Jeff, will take care from the next patchset.

Regards
Manish Dharanenthiran