Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-5903-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>,  "David S. Miller"
 <davem@davemloft.net>,  Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,  Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,  Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,  Rob Herring
 <robh+dt@kernel.org>,  Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,  Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
  Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,  Konrad Dybcio
 <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,  ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
  linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,  netdev@vger.kernel.org,
  devicetree@vger.kernel.org,  linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,  Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] wifi: ath10k: support board-specific
 firmware overrides
References: <20240306-wcn3990-firmware-path-v2-0-f89e98e71a57@linaro.org>
	<87plw7hgt4.fsf@kernel.org>
	<CAA8EJpr6fRfY5pNz6cXVTaNashqffy5_qLv9c35nkgjaDuSgyQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87cys7hard.fsf@kernel.org>
	<CAA8EJpowyEEbXQ4YK-GQ63wZSkJDy04qJsC2uuYCXt+aJ1HSOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87v85wg39y.fsf@kernel.org>
	<CAA8EJpq_XLUEMC67ck2tZRjqS0PazCkQWWMGmwydeWxTETHwcg@mail.gmail.com>
	<871q7k3tnq.fsf@kernel.org>
	<CAA8EJppASEmj6-Jt7OCABAeqr8umSgXaDDha9nn2nRafuZ-Gvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 15:41:38 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CAA8EJppASEmj6-Jt7OCABAeqr8umSgXaDDha9nn2nRafuZ-Gvw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Dmitry Baryshkov's message of "Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:34:29 +0300")
Message-ID: <87sf002d8d.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> writes:

> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 15:01, Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 17:19, Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> writes:
>> >>
>> >> >> To be on the safe side using 'qcom-rb1' makes sense but on the other
>> >> >> hand that means we need to update linux-firmware (basically add a new
>> >> >> symlink) everytime a new product is added. But are there going to be
>> >> >> that many new ath10k based products?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Using 'qcm2290' is easier because for a new product then there only
>> >> >> needs to be a change in DTS and no need to change anything
>> >> >> linux-firmware. But here the risk is that if there's actually two
>> >> >> different ath10k firmware branches for 'qcm2290'. If that ever happens
>> >> >> (I hope not) I guess we could solve that by adding new 'qcm2290-foo'
>> >> >> directory?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But I don't really know, thoughts?
>> >> >
>> >> > After some thought, I'd suggest to follow approach taken by the rest
>> >> > of qcom firmware:
>> >>
>> >> Can you provide pointers to those cases?
>> >
>> > https://gitlab.com/kernel-firmware/linux-firmware/-/tree/main/qcom/sc8280xp/LENOVO/21BX
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > put a default (accepted by non-secured hardware) firmware to SoC dir
>> >> > and then put a vendor-specific firmware into subdir. If any of such
>> >> > vendors appear, we might even implement structural fallback: first
>> >> > look into sdm845/Google/blueline, then in sdm845/Google, sdm845/ and
>> >> > finally just under hw1.0.
>> >>
>> >> Honestly that looks quite compilicated compared to having just one
>> >> sub-directory. How will ath10k find the directory names (or I vendor and
>> >> model names) like 'Google' or 'blueline' in this example?
>> >
>> > I was thinking about the firmware-name = "sdm845/Google/blueline". But
>> > this can be really simpler, firmware-name = "blueline" or
>> > "sdm845/blueline" with no need for fallbacks.
>>
>> I have been also thinking about this and I would prefer not to have the
>> fallbacks. But good if you agree with that.
>>
>> IMHO just "sdm845-blueline" would be the most simple. I don't see the
>> point of having a directory structure when there are not that many
>> directories really. But this is just cosmetics.
>
> It is "not many directories" if we are thinking about the
> linux-firmware or open devices. But once embedded distros start
> picking this up for the supported devices, this can quickly become a
> nuisance.

Ok. Just out of curiosity, any ideas how many devices/products are there
with wcn3990 who want to use ath10k?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches