Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-6071-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <5cf6b243c3967cd5a630f8f8e5bf17f7c9010f01.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] wifi: mwifiex: add code to support
 host mlme
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@nxp.com>, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>, "kvalo@kernel.org"
 <kvalo@kernel.org>, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org"
 <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@nxp.com>, 
 "rafael.beims" <rafael.beims@toradex.com>, Francesco Dolcini
 <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:55:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <DU0PR04MB96365F2B6AFD856655D6A66CD1062@DU0PR04MB9636.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <ZfTspRKFgrO9xCTH@google.com>
	 <969e95ccc4a1d35b45212b7fcb536ee90995e3b5.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <PA4PR04MB9638D253189D6DD330B198B2D1332@PA4PR04MB9638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
	 <PA4PR04MB9638BE73DDBCE1CE8AA32BA8D1332@PA4PR04MB9638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
	 <b2d9a7ef53c5ab4212617e8edf202bbafe52e2f8.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <ZftaJEIeNfV7YrVo@google.com>
	 <PA4PR04MB9638F5037D1AB9BCF51CC9D9D1322@PA4PR04MB9638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
	 <Zf4rDifM6bLuqpX2@google.com>
	 <4e5f3741819e457c5c79d825c6520cb9ee531b95.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <PA4PR04MB96386917877832602F221282D13A2@PA4PR04MB9638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
	 <ZgxCngq_Rguc4qs8@google.com>
	 <DU0PR04MB96365F2B6AFD856655D6A66CD1062@DU0PR04MB9636.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.4 (3.50.4-1.fc39) 
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 07:30 +0000, David Lin wrote:
> Hi Johannes and Brian,
> =20
>     I think this patch is used to leverage MLME of wpa_supplicant and hos=
tapd. It won't affect the usage of cfg80211 for mwifiex. I wonder if I can =
prepare patch v10.

No. That sentence tells me you've _still_ not understood any of the
technical arguments in the thread, you're _still_ arguing with
completely uninteresting arguments. Where before you had "it's well
tested" and "it uses 'standard' APIs" now you're saying "it doesn't
affect anyone else". All of that is obvious, and also completely besides
the point.

Please go back and actually _understand_ the discussion. Also actually
_participate_ in the discussion too, so far you've pretty much only made
empty arguments. Once you've understood the concerns and can explain why
they don't apply, _then_ you can resend the patch.

johannes