Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-6130-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Message-ID: <29f7ecb6d7c208c3614f37616943d5f97bb134d3.camel@freebox.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] wifi: cfg80211: Add provision to advertise
 multiple radio in one wiphy
From: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
Reply-To: mbizon@freebox.fr
To: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>, Ben Greear
 <greearb@candelatech.com>, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>, 
 Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <quic_vthiagar@quicinc.com>, Karthikeyan
 Periyasamy <quic_periyasa@quicinc.com>,  ath12k@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:08:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0cfe990b-182b-4ceb-b5b4-2989fefedb2f@quicinc.com>
References: <20240328072916.1164195-1-quic_periyasa@quicinc.com>
	 <20240328072916.1164195-2-quic_periyasa@quicinc.com>
	 <e36599d3269496de59505b36be46f873976f8706.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <033185b0-f878-a50b-d0d9-57fa79439bdf@quicinc.com>
	 <ef6b6a7a4a9d3b01c0eb6abf0991e7e27425e102.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <80fe5786-f764-455d-ac44-22adf7aeaf94@candelatech.com>
	 <31f30c0e318904f3a082c7f213576ceb1f407141.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <20b56e52-a5e2-70cd-a62a-8c4a3526c2cf@candelatech.com>
	 <614bb8a8f1d9174ad7d87cf7636f657cda7b1ef9.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <aa9e1d54-bb5f-37cc-335f-c9970ab13789@candelatech.com>
	 <0cfe990b-182b-4ceb-b5b4-2989fefedb2f@quicinc.com>
Organization: Freebox
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4-0ubuntu2 
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0


On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 09:43 -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:


Hello Jeff,

> Ben, the patches we have posted so far allow ath12k to either have
> each phy assigned to a separate wiphy (legacy operation) or have
> multiple phys assigned to a single wiphy (required for MLO
> operation). In an upcoming patch we'll introduce a DT-driven

When the physical wiphy are grouped in a logical single wiphy, can we
still do "legacy" operations on the individual physical wiphy ?=C2=A0

For example, starting a 5Ghz AP in ax-only mode, and at the same time
creating a STA interface on 2.4GHz ?

If not that's a regression. Changing DT (imply reboot) does not really
fix the issue.
=20
--=20
Maxime