Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-7279-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] wifi: ath12k: remove redundant peer delete
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240429081525.983-5-quic_kangyang@quicinc.com>
References: <20240429081525.983-5-quic_kangyang@quicinc.com>
To: kangyang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com>
Cc: <ath12k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
 <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com>
User-Agent: pwcli/0.1.1-git (https://github.com/kvalo/pwcli/) Python/3.11.2
Message-ID: <171507720282.3827098.15356808712274335251.kvalo@kernel.org>
Date: Tue,  7 May 2024 10:20:04 +0000 (UTC)

kangyang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> wrote:

> Firmware will create internal peer for monitor mode. For host no need to
> do peer create and peer delete.
> 
> So remove related code.
> 
> Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com>
> Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <quic_kvalo@quicinc.com>

What about QCN9274? The commit message doesn't mention that at all. Is it safe
to assume that QCN9274 firmware acts the same?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240429081525.983-5-quic_kangyang@quicinc.com/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches