Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-7864-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
Cc: <ath11k@lists.infradead.org>,  <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
  <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: ath11k: move power type check to ASSOC stage
 when connecting to 6 GHz AP
References: <20240424064019.4847-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
	<87wmo0k71i.fsf@kernel.org>
	<3dc28f34-45cc-4e14-b9ea-1f7b78a6a591@quicinc.com>
	<87h6esebu8.fsf@kernel.org>
	<b6b23a29-78ef-4e4f-8042-e13833fcb1ec@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 08:12:05 +0300
In-Reply-To: <b6b23a29-78ef-4e4f-8042-e13833fcb1ec@quicinc.com> (Baochen
	Qiang's message of "Tue, 21 May 2024 09:52:06 +0800")
Message-ID: <878r03eoka.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com> writes:

> On 5/20/2024 11:34 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com> writes:
>>> On 5/11/2024 5:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh, this fell through the cracks. Commit bc8a0fac8677 was introduced in
>>>> v6.9-rc1 so I should have sent this to v6.9 but it's too late now. I'll
>>>> need to queue this for v6.10 via wireless tree.
>>>>
>>>> Adding the regression also to regzbot:
>>>>
>>>> #regzbot introduced: bc8a0fac8677
>>>> #regzbot title: ath11k: connection to 6 GHz AP fails
>>>>
>>> Hi Kalle, with an upcoming patch this regression is expected to be fixed:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240506214536.310434f55f76.I6aca291ee06265e3f63e0f9024ba19a850b53a33@changeid/#t
>>>
>>> So here the ath11k fix would not be needed any more once above patch got merged.
>> 
>> What happens if we apply both patch 'wifi: ath11k: move power type check
>> to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' and patchset 'wifi:
>> mac80211: build TPE handling'? In other words, do they conflict from
>> functionality point of view?
>
> No functional conflict, 6 GHz AP connection would also succeed with
> both of them applied.

Ok, thanks. In that case I would like take patch 'wifi: ath11k: move
power type check to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' to
ath-current branch from which it will go to v6.10. Is that ok for
everyone?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches