Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless+bounces-7865-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Message-ID: <e235c2f1-4d52-4a89-9d1b-9d63d0ff4c6f@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:27:00 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: ath11k: move power type check to ASSOC stage
 when connecting to 6 GHz AP
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
CC: <ath11k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
References: <20240424064019.4847-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
 <87wmo0k71i.fsf@kernel.org>
 <3dc28f34-45cc-4e14-b9ea-1f7b78a6a591@quicinc.com>
 <87h6esebu8.fsf@kernel.org>
 <b6b23a29-78ef-4e4f-8042-e13833fcb1ec@quicinc.com>
 <878r03eoka.fsf@kernel.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <878r03eoka.fsf@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 5/21/2024 1:12 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com> writes:
> 
>> On 5/20/2024 11:34 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com> writes:
>>>> On 5/11/2024 5:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, this fell through the cracks. Commit bc8a0fac8677 was introduced in
>>>>> v6.9-rc1 so I should have sent this to v6.9 but it's too late now. I'll
>>>>> need to queue this for v6.10 via wireless tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adding the regression also to regzbot:
>>>>>
>>>>> #regzbot introduced: bc8a0fac8677
>>>>> #regzbot title: ath11k: connection to 6 GHz AP fails
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Kalle, with an upcoming patch this regression is expected to be fixed:
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240506214536.310434f55f76.I6aca291ee06265e3f63e0f9024ba19a850b53a33@changeid/#t
>>>>
>>>> So here the ath11k fix would not be needed any more once above patch got merged.
>>>
>>> What happens if we apply both patch 'wifi: ath11k: move power type check
>>> to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' and patchset 'wifi:
>>> mac80211: build TPE handling'? In other words, do they conflict from
>>> functionality point of view?
>>
>> No functional conflict, 6 GHz AP connection would also succeed with
>> both of them applied.
> 
> Ok, thanks. In that case I would like take patch 'wifi: ath11k: move
> power type check to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' to
> ath-current branch from which it will go to v6.10. Is that ok for
> everyone?
Good to me.
>