Jesse Pollard ([email protected])

Number of posts: 59 (0.07 per day)
First post: 2000-10-26 18:34:25
Last post: 2003-03-19 17:47:41

Next Page
Date List Subject
2003-03-19 17:47:41 linux-kernel Re: Everything gone!
2003-03-11 17:56:08 linux-kernel Re: [Resending] User Process and a Kernel Thread
2003-03-06 15:31:53 linux-kernel Re: Linux vs Windows temperature anomaly
2003-03-06 14:18:03 linux-kernel Re: Linux vs Windows temperature anomaly
2003-03-03 14:35:03 linux-kernel Re: Protecting processes from the OOM killer
2003-02-25 15:49:38 linux-kernel Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
2003-02-14 21:41:16 linux-kernel Re: RFC/CFT 1/1: SIGWINCH - behaviour change
2003-02-12 23:15:23 linux-kernel Re: What went wrong with LSM, was: Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59
2003-02-12 21:20:55 linux-kernel Re: changing file copy to support extended attributes
2003-02-04 14:48:04 linux-kernel Re: Patch: oom_kill
2003-02-04 13:59:19 linux-kernel Re: Patch: oom_kill
2003-01-29 13:52:16 linux-kernel Re: AW: Bootscreen
2003-01-22 23:06:59 linux-kernel Re: [OT] Re: Linux in the News! WooHoo!
2003-01-22 23:00:58 linux-kernel Re: [OT] Re: Linux in the News! WooHoo!
2003-01-21 22:48:07 linux-kernel Re: [OT] Re: Linux in the News! WooHoo!
2003-01-16 16:25:27 linux-kernel Re: Tar'ing /proc ???
2003-01-15 21:31:06 linux-kernel Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux.
2003-01-15 21:23:18 linux-kernel Re: ISO-9660 Rock Ridge gives different links different inums
2003-01-13 17:31:55 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-13 17:04:17 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-09 17:42:28 linux-kernel Re: What's in a name?
2003-01-08 15:40:36 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-08 15:27:50 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-08 14:53:27 linux-kernel Re: Honest does not pay here ...
2003-01-07 23:04:51 linux-kernel Re: Honest does not pay here ...
2003-01-07 18:39:14 linux-kernel Re: Undelete files on ext3 ??
2003-01-07 18:27:53 linux-kernel Re: Honest does not pay here ...
2002-12-13 16:18:37 linux-kernel Re: Symlink indirection
2002-12-12 16:10:21 linux-kernel Re: Modules and dll
2002-12-09 14:03:14 linux-kernel Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ???
2002-11-22 14:06:53 linux-kernel Re: Where is ext2/3 secure delete ("s") attribute?
2002-11-21 22:46:23 linux-kernel Re: Failover in NFS
2002-11-18 22:34:59 linux-kernel Re: Failover in NFS
2002-11-18 22:05:36 linux-kernel Re: Failover in NFS
2002-11-07 22:36:42 linux-kernel Re: Why are exe, cwd, and root priviledged bits of information?
2002-11-06 13:32:26 linux-kernel Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?
2002-11-04 15:09:15 linux-kernel Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?
2002-11-04 14:54:44 linux-kernel Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?
2002-10-31 21:48:33 linux-kernel Re: The ACL debate (was: Re: What's left over.)
2002-10-31 19:05:07 linux-kernel Re: How to get a local IPv4 address from within a kernel module?
2002-10-31 16:45:27 linux-kernel Re: The ACL debate (was: Re: What's left over.)
2002-10-30 14:48:16 linux-kernel Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Squashfs released (a highly compressed filesystem)
2002-10-23 14:12:28 linux-kernel Re: [BK PATCH 1/4] fix NGROUPS hard limit (resend)
2002-10-22 20:10:06 linux-kernel Re: [BK PATCH 1/4] fix NGROUPS hard limit (resend)
2002-10-22 19:07:37 linux-kernel Re: [BK PATCH 1/4] fix NGROUPS hard limit (resend)
2002-10-22 18:00:14 linux-kernel Re: [BK PATCH 1/4] fix NGROUPS hard limit (resend)
2002-10-22 15:37:06 linux-kernel Re: can chroot be made safe for non-root?
2002-10-08 22:12:04 linux-kernel Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))
2002-10-07 14:57:57 linux-kernel Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))
2002-10-07 13:52:43 linux-kernel Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))
2002-09-13 18:02:27 linux-kernel Re: [No Subject]