Mikulas Patocka ([email protected])

Number of posts: 235 (0.1 per day)
First post: 2000-11-08 16:37:30
Last post: 2007-04-28 22:38:06

Date List Subject
2005-10-10 23:34:22 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations
2005-10-10 23:17:01 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations
2005-10-10 22:49:44 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations
2005-10-10 21:58:53 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations
2005-06-01 01:44:02 linux-kernel Re: RAID-5 design bug (or misfeature)
2005-05-30 16:09:46 linux-kernel Re: RAID-5 design bug (or misfeature)
2005-05-30 02:48:00 linux-kernel Re: RAID-5 design bug (or misfeature)
2005-05-29 22:53:29 linux-kernel RAID-5 design bug (or misfeature)
2005-05-16 02:25:07 linux-kernel Re: Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
2005-05-15 16:59:11 linux-kernel Re: Disk write cache
2005-05-15 16:24:22 linux-kernel Re: Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
2005-05-15 15:00:55 linux-kernel Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
2005-05-15 14:21:39 linux-kernel Re: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability
2005-05-15 14:01:08 linux-kernel Re: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability
2005-05-15 13:51:10 linux-kernel Re: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability
2005-05-15 13:38:48 linux-kernel Re: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability
2004-11-16 22:41:54 linux-kernel oops on boot when initializing CDROM
2004-04-19 23:07:05 linux-kernel Re: task switching at Page Faults
2004-04-19 19:49:07 linux-kernel Re: task switching at Page Faults
2003-11-27 20:42:03 linux-kernel Re: BUG (non-kernel), can hurt developers.
2003-09-29 21:43:40 linux-kernel Re: -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant.
2003-09-29 21:36:51 linux-kernel Re: -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant.
2003-09-29 20:20:48 linux-kernel -mregparm=3 (was Re: [PATCH] i386 do_machine_check() is redundant.
2003-09-28 17:31:06 linux-kernel Re: [OT] No Swap. Re: [BUG 2.6.90-test5] kernel shits itself with 48mb ram under moderate load
2003-09-28 15:52:11 linux-kernel Re: [OT] No Swap. Re: [BUG 2.6.90-test5] kernel shits itself with 48mb ram under moderate load
2003-08-31 23:39:59 linux-kernel Re: Re: Re: IDE DMA breakage w/ 2.4.21+ and 2.6.0-test4(-mm4)
2003-08-30 12:33:16 linux-kernel Re: [2.4] gcc3 warns about type-punned pointers ?
2003-07-29 17:20:47 linux-kernel Re: 2.6.0-test2: cursor started to disappear
2003-07-11 18:59:48 linux-kernel Re: Sound updating, security of strlcpy and a question on pci v unload
2003-07-10 17:32:33 linux-kernel Re: 2.5.74-mm3 OOM killer fubared ?
2003-07-10 17:28:52 linux-kernel Re: 2.5.74-mm3 OOM killer fubared ?
2003-07-09 12:40:27 linux-kernel Re: Redundant memset in AIO read_events
2003-06-23 12:44:34 linux-kernel Re: no crash after setting ESP to 0 in module
2003-02-10 16:19:14 linux-kernel Re: 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5: fsync buffer race
2003-02-05 15:03:46 linux-kernel Re: 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5: fsync buffer race
2003-02-03 09:20:10 linux-kernel Re: 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5: fsync buffer race
2003-02-03 01:03:34 linux-kernel Re: 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5: fsync buffer race
2003-02-02 23:23:04 linux-kernel 2.4, 2.5: SMP race: __sync_single_inode vs. __mark_inode_dirty
2003-02-02 23:22:44 linux-kernel 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5: fsync buffer race
2001-10-08 23:54:52 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-08 23:47:02 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-08 23:32:32 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-08 22:24:45 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-07 15:42:30 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-07 12:28:22 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-06 22:58:37 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-06 22:36:23 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-06 22:33:53 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-06 22:33:23 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-06 19:13:02 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed
2001-10-06 19:07:32 linux-kernel Re: %u-order allocation failed