2012-11-30 18:31:38

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: pull request: wireless 2012-11-30

commit 9f8933e960f98d27742727445061b0ece934e5cf

Dave,

I have a couple of stragglers intended for 3.7...

The iwlwifi patch fixes a bug in CCK basic rate calculations.

The mac80211 patch removes an unnecessary function call that was
generating a lot of log SPAM.

Please let me know if there are problems!

John

---

The following changes since commit e196c0e579902f42cf72414461fb034e5a1ffbf7:

bonding: fix race condition in bonding_store_slaves_active (2012-11-29 13:13:15 -0500)

are available in the git repository at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless.git for-davem

for you to fetch changes up to 9f8933e960f98d27742727445061b0ece934e5cf:

Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless into for-davem (2012-11-30 11:27:32 -0500)

----------------------------------------------------------------

Emmanuel Grumbach (1):
iwlwifi: fix the basic CCK rates calculation

Johannes Berg (1):
mac80211: fix remain-on-channel (non-)cancelling

John W. Linville (2):
Merge branch 'for-john' of git://git.kernel.org/.../iwlwifi/iwlwifi-fixes
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/.../linville/wireless into for-davem

drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rxon.c | 12 ++++++------
net/mac80211/offchannel.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rxon.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rxon.c
index 1089639..2830ea2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rxon.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rxon.c
@@ -1012,12 +1012,12 @@ static void iwl_calc_basic_rates(struct iwl_priv *priv,
* As a consequence, it's not as complicated as it sounds, just add
* any lower rates to the ACK rate bitmap.
*/
- if (IWL_RATE_11M_INDEX < lowest_present_ofdm)
- ofdm |= IWL_RATE_11M_MASK >> IWL_FIRST_CCK_RATE;
- if (IWL_RATE_5M_INDEX < lowest_present_ofdm)
- ofdm |= IWL_RATE_5M_MASK >> IWL_FIRST_CCK_RATE;
- if (IWL_RATE_2M_INDEX < lowest_present_ofdm)
- ofdm |= IWL_RATE_2M_MASK >> IWL_FIRST_CCK_RATE;
+ if (IWL_RATE_11M_INDEX < lowest_present_cck)
+ cck |= IWL_RATE_11M_MASK >> IWL_FIRST_CCK_RATE;
+ if (IWL_RATE_5M_INDEX < lowest_present_cck)
+ cck |= IWL_RATE_5M_MASK >> IWL_FIRST_CCK_RATE;
+ if (IWL_RATE_2M_INDEX < lowest_present_cck)
+ cck |= IWL_RATE_2M_MASK >> IWL_FIRST_CCK_RATE;
/* 1M already there or needed so always add */
cck |= IWL_RATE_1M_MASK >> IWL_FIRST_CCK_RATE;

diff --git a/net/mac80211/offchannel.c b/net/mac80211/offchannel.c
index 83608ac..2c84185 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/offchannel.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/offchannel.c
@@ -458,8 +458,6 @@ void ieee80211_roc_purge(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata)
list_move_tail(&roc->list, &tmp_list);
roc->abort = true;
}
-
- ieee80211_start_next_roc(local);
mutex_unlock(&local->mtx);

list_for_each_entry_safe(roc, tmp, &tmp_list, list) {
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.


2012-11-30 18:40:29

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless 2012-11-30

From: "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:25:00 -0500

> I have a couple of stragglers intended for 3.7...
>
> The iwlwifi patch fixes a bug in CCK basic rate calculations.
>
> The mac80211 patch removes an unnecessary function call that was
> generating a lot of log SPAM.

Pulled, thanks John.

I want to warn you ahead of time that these might not make it.

2012-11-30 19:16:35

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless 2012-11-30

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:40:18PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:25:00 -0500
>
> > I have a couple of stragglers intended for 3.7...
> >
> > The iwlwifi patch fixes a bug in CCK basic rate calculations.
> >
> > The mac80211 patch removes an unnecessary function call that was
> > generating a lot of log SPAM.
>
> Pulled, thanks John.
>
> I want to warn you ahead of time that these might not make it.

Yes, I suspect that might be the case -- but it won't make it if I
don't send it... :-)

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.