Michael Clark wrote:
> On 09/30/02 05:46, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Dave Jones wrote:
> >>Joe Thornber sent a patch removing LVM1, but LVM2 has yet to
> >>make an appearance in 2.5.x patchform afair. LVM is in one of
> >>those sneaky positions where they could theoretically cheat
> >>the feature freeze, as whats in the tree right now is fubar,
> >>and we need /something/ before going 2.6/3.0.
> > Is not EVMS ready for the show? Is Linux >=2.6 going to have LVM2 and
> > EVMS? Or just LVM2? I'm not aware of the current status, but I do recall
> > having seen EVMS stable announcements (but not sure about 2.5 status).
> From reading the EVMS list, it was working with 2.5.36 a couple weeks
> ago but needs some small bio and gendisk changes to work in 2.5.39.
It's going to break bigtime if someone ups and removes all the
On Monday 30 September 2002 02:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Michael Clark wrote:
> > From reading the EVMS list, it was working with 2.5.36 a couple weeks
> > ago but needs some small bio and gendisk changes to work in 2.5.39.
> It's going to break bigtime if someone ups and removes all the
> kiobuf code.....
I don't think that would be the case, since EVMS doesn't use kiobuf's.