Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.2.57-rt84-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release candidate).
The pre-releases will not be pushed to the git repository, only the
final release is.
If all goes well, this patch will be converted to the next main release
on 4/30/2014.
Enjoy,
-- Steve
To build 3.2.57-rt84-rc1 directly, the following patches should be applied:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/linux-3.2.tar.xz
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/patch-3.2.57.xz
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.2/patch-3.2.57-rt84-rc1.patch.xz
You can also build from 3.2.57-rt83 by applying the incremental patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.2/incr/patch-3.2.57-rt83-rt84-rc1.patch.xz
Changes from 3.2.57-rt83:
---
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2):
net: gianfar: do not disable interrupts
rcu: make RCU_BOOST default on RT
Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (1):
Linux 3.2.57-rt84-rc1
----
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c | 16 ++++++++--------
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_sysfs.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
init/Kconfig | 2 +-
localversion-rt | 2 +-
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
27.04.2014 18:39, Steven Rostedt пишет:
> Dear RT Folks,
>
> This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.2.57-rt84-rc1.
>
> Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
More than two years our thin clients (about 5000 machines, Intel Atom, x86_32)
work with RCU_BOOST.
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_PRIO=80
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY=400
--
Pavel.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 02:15:28 +0400
Pavel Vasilyev <[email protected]> wrote:
> 27.04.2014 18:39, Steven Rostedt пишет:
> > Dear RT Folks,
> >
> > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.2.57-rt84-rc1.
> >
> > Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
>
>
> More than two years our thin clients (about 5000 machines, Intel Atom, x86_32)
> work with RCU_BOOST.
>
> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y
> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_PRIO=80
> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY=400
>
Is this just a confirmation of having RCU_BOOST default y for
PREEMPT_RT is a good thing?
Thanks,
-- Steve
28.04.2014 17:39, Steven Rostedt пишет:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 02:15:28 +0400
> Pavel Vasilyev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 27.04.2014 18:39, Steven Rostedt пишет:
>>> Dear RT Folks,
>>>
>>> This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.2.57-rt84-rc1.
>>>
>>> Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
>>
>>
>> More than two years our thin clients (about 5000 machines, Intel Atom, x86_32)
>> work with RCU_BOOST.
>>
>> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y
>> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_PRIO=80
>> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY=400
>>
>
> Is this just a confirmation of having RCU_BOOST default y for
> PREEMPT_RT is a good thing?
Only 3.2-rt
--
Pavel.