2015-05-13 08:33:48

by Valentin Rothberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: h8300: device tree: undefined CONFIG_EDOSK2674

Hi Yoshinori,

your commit 5befaa907481 ("h8300: devicetree source") is in today's
linux-next tree (i.e., next-20150513) and adds the following line:

+dtb-$(CONFIG_EDOSK2674) := edosk2674.dtb

EDOSK2674 is not defined in Kconfig so that the device tree source
won't be touched. Some grepping indicates that it's just a typo and
'H8S_EDOSK2674' may be the correct option. Is that right?

I detected this issue with scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py by diffing
yesterday's and today's linux-next tree.

Kind regards,
Valentin


2015-05-13 13:48:21

by Yoshinori Sato

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: h8300: device tree: undefined CONFIG_EDOSK2674

At Wed, 13 May 2015 10:33:13 +0200,
Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>
> Hi Yoshinori,
>
> your commit 5befaa907481 ("h8300: devicetree source") is in today's
> linux-next tree (i.e., next-20150513) and adds the following line:
>
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_EDOSK2674) := edosk2674.dtb
>
> EDOSK2674 is not defined in Kconfig so that the device tree source
> won't be touched. Some grepping indicates that it's just a typo and
> 'H8S_EDOSK2674' may be the correct option. Is that right?
>
> I detected this issue with scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py by diffing
> yesterday's and today's linux-next tree.
>
> Kind regards,
> Valentin

Yes.
CONFIG_H8S_EDOSK2674 is correct.

Thanks report.

--
Yoshinori Sato
<[email protected]>