Here are contest (http://contest.kolivas.org) benchmarks with the osdl
hardware (http://www.osdl.org) for 2.5.64:
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.60 2 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.61 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.62 3 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.63 4 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.64 3 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.60 2 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.61 1 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.62 3 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.63 4 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.64 3 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 92 81.5 29.7 17.4 1.16
2.5.60 2 93 80.6 30.5 17.2 1.18
2.5.61 1 93 80.6 29.0 16.1 1.18
2.5.62 3 92 81.5 30.0 16.3 1.16
2.5.63 4 92 81.5 28.2 15.2 1.16
2.5.64 3 92 81.5 30.0 16.3 1.16
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 98 80.6 2.0 5.1 1.24
2.5.60 2 99 78.8 1.0 4.0 1.25
2.5.61 2 100 79.0 1.0 4.0 1.27
2.5.62 3 99 79.8 1.0 4.0 1.25
2.5.63 3 99 79.8 1.0 4.0 1.25
2.5.64 3 100 79.0 0.0 0.0 1.27
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29
2.5.60 2 101 76.2 1.0 5.0 1.28
2.5.61 2 102 75.5 1.0 4.9 1.29
2.5.62 3 103 73.8 1.0 3.9 1.30
2.5.63 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29
2.5.64 3 103 73.8 1.0 3.9 1.30
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 152 50.0 34.1 13.1 1.92
2.5.60 2 139 54.7 29.0 12.1 1.76
2.5.61 2 143 52.4 32.9 13.3 1.81
2.5.62 2 205 36.6 51.7 15.0 2.59
2.5.63 5 217 35.0 56.7 15.1 2.75
2.5.64 3 229 33.2 58.8 14.8 2.90
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 89 84.3 11.2 5.6 1.13
2.5.60 2 90 83.3 10.8 5.5 1.14
2.5.61 2 91 82.4 11.1 5.5 1.15
2.5.62 2 96 78.1 15.7 8.2 1.22
2.5.63 4 95 78.9 15.3 8.3 1.20
2.5.64 3 100 75.0 18.4 9.0 1.27
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 101 77.2 6.5 5.0 1.28
2.5.60 2 103 74.8 6.2 6.8 1.30
2.5.61 2 102 77.5 6.3 4.9 1.29
2.5.62 2 103 75.7 6.2 4.9 1.30
2.5.63 3 106 74.5 5.7 4.7 1.34
2.5.64 3 103 76.7 6.2 4.9 1.30
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.60 2 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.61 2 95 81.1 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.62 2 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.63 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22
2.5.64 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 95 82.1 52.7 2.1 1.20
2.5.60 2 98 79.6 53.0 2.0 1.24
2.5.61 1 96 81.2 54.0 2.1 1.22
2.5.62 2 101 78.2 59.0 2.0 1.28
2.5.63 3 104 75.0 57.7 1.9 1.32
2.5.64 3 105 74.3 58.3 1.9 1.33
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 214 36.4 2.3 40.7 2.71
2.5.61 2 237 32.5 3.0 47.3 3.00
2.5.62 2 226 34.1 2.5 42.0 2.86
2.5.63 4 194 39.2 2.0 38.7 2.46
2.5.64 3 222 34.2 2.3 38.7 2.81
Slightly longer io_load and io_other times. Otherwise very similar.
Con
> ctar_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.5.64 3 100 79.0 0.0 0.0 1.27
m? No load ?
Bye.
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:12 pm, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> > ctar_load:
> > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> > 2.5.64 3 100 79.0 0.0 0.0 1.27
>
> m? No load ?
Looks like it didn't complete creating a tar in that time or something went
wrong with the load accounting. The time take for kernel compilation is
certainly consistent with other kernels.
Con