2017-12-06 01:00:21

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all,

After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c: In function 'intel_dsi_get_panel_orientation':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c:1673:13: error: storage size of 'plane' isn't known
enum plane plane;
^

Caused by commit

82daca297506 ("drm/i915: Add "panel orientation" property to the panel connector, v6.")

interacting with commit

ed15030d7ab0 ("drm/i915: s/enum plane/enum i9xx_plane_id/")

from the drm-intel tree.

I have applied the following merge fix patch for today.

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:56:32 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix up for "drm/i915: s/enum plane/enum
i9xx_plane_id/"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
index 1b60df3c14a0..f67d321376e4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
@@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@ static int intel_dsi_get_panel_orientation(struct intel_connector *connector)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
int orientation = DRM_MODE_PANEL_ORIENTATION_NORMAL;
- enum plane plane;
+ enum i9xx_plane_id plane;
u32 val;

if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
--
2.15.0

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


2017-12-06 01:21:56

by Rodrigo Vivi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 01:00:15AM +0000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,

Hi Stephen,

I had just written the email for you about this.
Feel free to ignore that one since you already found the solution
and sorry for the delay on warning you.

>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c: In function 'intel_dsi_get_panel_orientation':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c:1673:13: error: storage size of 'plane' isn't known
> enum plane plane;
> ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 82daca297506 ("drm/i915: Add "panel orientation" property to the panel connector, v6.")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> ed15030d7ab0 ("drm/i915: s/enum plane/enum i9xx_plane_id/")
>
> from the drm-intel tree.
>
> I have applied the following merge fix patch for today.

Yes, that's the right one.

Thanks,
Rodrigo.

>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:56:32 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix up for "drm/i915: s/enum plane/enum
> i9xx_plane_id/"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 1b60df3c14a0..f67d321376e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@ static int intel_dsi_get_panel_orientation(struct intel_connector *connector)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> int orientation = DRM_MODE_PANEL_ORIENTATION_NORMAL;
> - enum plane plane;
> + enum i9xx_plane_id plane;
> u32 val;
>
> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
> --
> 2.15.0
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

2017-12-06 02:12:27

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi Rodrigo,

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:21:54 -0800 Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I had just written the email for you about this.
> Feel free to ignore that one since you already found the solution
> and sorry for the delay on warning you.

And I should read all my email before responding to earlier ones :-)

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell