2003-11-07 03:59:15

by david nicol

Subject: funny crapping out in make bzImage

I had built test-6 -- do I need newer tools for test-9?




make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC fs/proc/array.o
fs/proc/array.c: In function `proc_pid_stat':
fs/proc/array.c:398: Unrecognizable insn:
(insn/i 1337 1673 1667 (parallel[
(set (reg:SI 0 eax)
(asm_operands ("") ("=a") 0[
(reg:DI 1 edx)
]
[
(asm_input:DI ("A"))
] ("include/linux/times.h") 37))
(set (reg:SI 1 edx)
(asm_operands ("") ("=d") 1[
(reg:DI 1 edx)
]
[
(asm_input:DI ("A"))
] ("include/linux/times.h") 37))
(clobber (reg:QI 19 dirflag))
(clobber (reg:QI 18 fpsr))
(clobber (reg:QI 17 flags))
] ) -1 (insn_list 1331 (nil))
(nil))
fs/proc/array.c:398: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
make[2]: *** [fs/proc/array.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2
[david@plaza linux-2.6.0-test9
--
david nicol / A thousand towers rise before me and I cannot climb them all.

2003-11-07 04:55:18

by Randy.Dunlap

Subject: Re: funny crapping out in make bzImage

On 06 Nov 2003 21:59:06 -0600 david nicol <[email protected]> wrote:

|
| I had built test-6 -- do I need newer tools for test-9?
|
|
| make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
| CHK include/linux/compile.h
| CC fs/proc/array.o
| fs/proc/array.c: In function `proc_pid_stat':
| fs/proc/array.c:398: Unrecognizable insn:
| (insn/i 1337 1673 1667 (parallel[
| (set (reg:SI 0 eax)
| (asm_operands ("") ("=a") 0[
| (reg:DI 1 edx)
| ]
| [
| (asm_input:DI ("A"))
| ] ("include/linux/times.h") 37))
| (set (reg:SI 1 edx)
| (asm_operands ("") ("=d") 1[
| (reg:DI 1 edx)
| ]
| [
| (asm_input:DI ("A"))
| ] ("include/linux/times.h") 37))
| (clobber (reg:QI 19 dirflag))
| (clobber (reg:QI 18 fpsr))
| (clobber (reg:QI 17 flags))
| ] ) -1 (insn_list 1331 (nil))
| (nil))
| fs/proc/array.c:398: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
| make[2]: *** [fs/proc/array.o] Error 1
| make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
| make: *** [fs] Error 2
| [david@plaza linux-2.6.0-test9
| --

This is gcc 2.96 ??
This problem has been reported multiple times.
Yes, you need a different gcc version, or there are a couple of
patches around that split up the code around line 398 into
smaller pieces that gcc 2.96 can handle.

--
~Randy
MOTD: Always include version info.