Hello. I'm currently starting down the road to adding PPC32 support to
kgdb 2.0.x. The first patch I've got for you adds in hooks to allow for
doing setjmp/longjmp, if the arch wants to do so. This isn't tested,
yet (I haven't gotten that far in fixing ppc32 backend bits) but should
be OK. Comments?
===== include/linux/kgdb.h 1.1 vs edited =====
--- 1.1/include/linux/kgdb.h Tue Jan 13 11:09:23 2004
+++ edited/include/linux/kgdb.h Wed Jan 14 09:02:54 2004
@@ -81,6 +81,10 @@
int (*remove_break) (unsigned long addr, int type);
void (*correct_hw_break) (void);
void (*handler_exit) (void);
+ void (*setjmp) (long *buf);
+ void (*longjmp) (long *buf, int val);
+ void (*clearjmp) (void);
+ int (*issetjmp) (void);
void (*shadowinfo)(struct pt_regs *regs, char *buffer, unsigned threadid);
struct task_struct *(*get_shadow_thread)(struct pt_regs *regs, int threadid);
struct pt_regs *(*shadow_regs)(struct pt_regs *regs, int threadid);
===== kernel/kgdbstub.c 1.1 vs edited =====
--- 1.1/kernel/kgdbstub.c Tue Jan 13 11:09:24 2004
+++ edited/kernel/kgdbstub.c Wed Jan 14 09:02:33 2004
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
int kgdb_initialized = 0;
int kgdb_enter = 0;
static const char hexchars[] = "0123456789abcdef";
+static u_int fault_jmp_buf[100];
int get_char(char *addr, unsigned char *data, int can_fault);
int set_char(char *addr, int data, int can_fault);
@@ -255,6 +256,9 @@
int i;
unsigned char ch;
+ if (kgdb_ops->setjmp)
+ kgdb_ops->setjmp((long *)fault_jmp_buf);
+
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
if (get_char(mem++, &ch, can_fault) < 0)
@@ -263,6 +267,10 @@
*buf++ = hexchars[ch >> 4];
*buf++ = hexchars[ch % 16];
}
+
+ if (kgdb_ops->clearjmp)
+ kgdb_ops->clearjmp();
+
*buf = 0;
return (buf);
}
@@ -275,12 +283,19 @@
int i;
unsigned char ch;
+ if (kgdb_ops->setjmp)
+ kgdb_ops->setjmp((long *)fault_jmp_buf);
+
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
ch = hex(*buf++) << 4;
ch = ch + hex(*buf++);
if (set_char(mem++, ch, can_fault) < 0)
break;
}
+
+ if (kgdb_ops->clearjmp)
+ kgdb_ops->clearjmp();
+
return (mem);
}
@@ -295,6 +310,9 @@
*longValue = 0;
+ if (kgdb_ops->setjmp)
+ kgdb_ops->setjmp((long *)fault_jmp_buf);
+
while (**ptr) {
hexValue = hex(**ptr);
if (hexValue >= 0) {
@@ -306,6 +324,9 @@
(*ptr)++;
}
+ if (kgdb_ops->clearjmp)
+ kgdb_ops->clearjmp();
+
return (numChars);
}
@@ -579,6 +600,11 @@
static char tmpstr[256];
int numshadowth = num_online_cpus() + kgdb_ops->shadowth;
int kgdb_usethreadid = 0;
+
+ if (kgdb_ops->issetjmp && kgdb_ops->issetjmp()) {
+ kgdb_ops->longjmp((long*)fault_jmp_buf, 1);
+ panic("longjmp failed!");
+ }
/*
* Interrupts will be restored by the 'trap return' code, except when
Also, how should I send a patch that touches both things in the core,
i386 and x86_64 patches (# HW breakpoints is arch-dependant.) ? Thanks.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
Hi Tom,
It's nice to see someone working on integrating powerpc kgdb with mainline
kgdb. There are a lot of features (like thread lists, gdb deatch-reattach,
automodule loading) powerpc kgdb will inherit automatically from common core.
setjmp, longjmp isn't required. search_exception_tables take care of invalid
memory accesses by kgdb.
In arch/ppc/mm/fault.c:do_page_fault, call bad_page_fault if
debugger_memerr_expected is non-zero instead of holding mmap_sem.
bad_page_fault calls search_exception_tables at the begining. It takes care of
invalid memory addresses by kgdb as kgdb uses get_user, put_user to access
memory when the access can fail.
For powerpc arch specific code (like entry.S) look at
http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/linux-2.4.23-kgdb-1.9.patch
It contains powerpc arch specific code for kgdb. I was never able to test this
code, so I don't know whether it works.
If you modify kgdb core as well as arch specific files, please try to send
separate patches. Single patch will require me to do more work when I merge
it against separate patches.
Thanks.
On Wednesday 14 Jan 2004 10:20 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hello. I'm currently starting down the road to adding PPC32 support to
> kgdb 2.0.x. The first patch I've got for you adds in hooks to allow for
> doing setjmp/longjmp, if the arch wants to do so. This isn't tested,
> yet (I haven't gotten that far in fixing ppc32 backend bits) but should
> be OK. Comments?
>
> ===== include/linux/kgdb.h 1.1 vs edited =====
> --- 1.1/include/linux/kgdb.h Tue Jan 13 11:09:23 2004
> +++ edited/include/linux/kgdb.h Wed Jan 14 09:02:54 2004
> @@ -81,6 +81,10 @@
> int (*remove_break) (unsigned long addr, int type);
> void (*correct_hw_break) (void);
> void (*handler_exit) (void);
> + void (*setjmp) (long *buf);
> + void (*longjmp) (long *buf, int val);
> + void (*clearjmp) (void);
> + int (*issetjmp) (void);
> void (*shadowinfo)(struct pt_regs *regs, char *buffer, unsigned
> threadid); struct task_struct *(*get_shadow_thread)(struct pt_regs *regs,
> int threadid); struct pt_regs *(*shadow_regs)(struct pt_regs *regs, int
> threadid); ===== kernel/kgdbstub.c 1.1 vs edited =====
> --- 1.1/kernel/kgdbstub.c Tue Jan 13 11:09:24 2004
> +++ edited/kernel/kgdbstub.c Wed Jan 14 09:02:33 2004
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
> int kgdb_initialized = 0;
> int kgdb_enter = 0;
> static const char hexchars[] = "0123456789abcdef";
> +static u_int fault_jmp_buf[100];
>
> int get_char(char *addr, unsigned char *data, int can_fault);
> int set_char(char *addr, int data, int can_fault);
> @@ -255,6 +256,9 @@
> int i;
> unsigned char ch;
>
> + if (kgdb_ops->setjmp)
> + kgdb_ops->setjmp((long *)fault_jmp_buf);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>
> if (get_char(mem++, &ch, can_fault) < 0)
> @@ -263,6 +267,10 @@
> *buf++ = hexchars[ch >> 4];
> *buf++ = hexchars[ch % 16];
> }
> +
> + if (kgdb_ops->clearjmp)
> + kgdb_ops->clearjmp();
> +
> *buf = 0;
> return (buf);
> }
> @@ -275,12 +283,19 @@
> int i;
> unsigned char ch;
>
> + if (kgdb_ops->setjmp)
> + kgdb_ops->setjmp((long *)fault_jmp_buf);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> ch = hex(*buf++) << 4;
> ch = ch + hex(*buf++);
> if (set_char(mem++, ch, can_fault) < 0)
> break;
> }
> +
> + if (kgdb_ops->clearjmp)
> + kgdb_ops->clearjmp();
> +
> return (mem);
> }
>
> @@ -295,6 +310,9 @@
>
> *longValue = 0;
>
> + if (kgdb_ops->setjmp)
> + kgdb_ops->setjmp((long *)fault_jmp_buf);
> +
> while (**ptr) {
> hexValue = hex(**ptr);
> if (hexValue >= 0) {
> @@ -306,6 +324,9 @@
> (*ptr)++;
> }
>
> + if (kgdb_ops->clearjmp)
> + kgdb_ops->clearjmp();
> +
> return (numChars);
> }
>
> @@ -579,6 +600,11 @@
> static char tmpstr[256];
> int numshadowth = num_online_cpus() + kgdb_ops->shadowth;
> int kgdb_usethreadid = 0;
> +
> + if (kgdb_ops->issetjmp && kgdb_ops->issetjmp()) {
> + kgdb_ops->longjmp((long*)fault_jmp_buf, 1);
> + panic("longjmp failed!");
> + }
>
> /*
> * Interrupts will be restored by the 'trap return' code, except when
>
> Also, how should I send a patch that touches both things in the core,
> i386 and x86_64 patches (# HW breakpoints is arch-dependant.) ? Thanks.
--
Amit Kale
EmSysSoft (http://www.emsyssoft.com)
KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger (http://kgdb.sourceforge.net)
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:52:30AM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> It's nice to see someone working on integrating powerpc kgdb with mainline
> kgdb. There are a lot of features (like thread lists, gdb deatch-reattach,
> automodule loading) powerpc kgdb will inherit automatically from common core.
>
> setjmp, longjmp isn't required. search_exception_tables take care of invalid
> memory accesses by kgdb.
>
> In arch/ppc/mm/fault.c:do_page_fault, call bad_page_fault if
> debugger_memerr_expected is non-zero instead of holding mmap_sem.
>
> bad_page_fault calls search_exception_tables at the begining. It takes care of
> invalid memory addresses by kgdb as kgdb uses get_user, put_user to access
> memory when the access can fail.
OK, thanks.
> For powerpc arch specific code (like entry.S) look at
> http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/linux-2.4.23-kgdb-1.9.patch
> It contains powerpc arch specific code for kgdb. I was never able to test this
> code, so I don't know whether it works.
It might work on some subset of machines, but the serial driver is still
broken for SERIAL_IO_MEM machines (which there are a lot of) nor is the
ppc 8xx (which is what I would assume TimeSys used) serial driver
patched up.
> If you modify kgdb core as well as arch specific files, please try to send
> separate patches. Single patch will require me to do more work when I merge
> it against separate patches.
OK. I _hope_ to get you a patch for the serial stuff shortly.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Friday 16 Jan 2004 9:27 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:52:30AM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > It's nice to see someone working on integrating powerpc kgdb with
> > mainline kgdb. There are a lot of features (like thread lists, gdb
> > deatch-reattach, automodule loading) powerpc kgdb will inherit
> > automatically from common core.
> >
> > setjmp, longjmp isn't required. search_exception_tables take care of
> > invalid memory accesses by kgdb.
> >
> > In arch/ppc/mm/fault.c:do_page_fault, call bad_page_fault if
> > debugger_memerr_expected is non-zero instead of holding mmap_sem.
> >
> > bad_page_fault calls search_exception_tables at the begining. It takes
> > care of invalid memory addresses by kgdb as kgdb uses get_user, put_user
> > to access memory when the access can fail.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> > For powerpc arch specific code (like entry.S) look at
> > http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/linux-2.4.23-kgdb-1.9.patch
> > It contains powerpc arch specific code for kgdb. I was never able to test
> > this code, so I don't know whether it works.
>
> It might work on some subset of machines, but the serial driver is still
> broken for SERIAL_IO_MEM machines (which there are a lot of) nor is the
> ppc 8xx (which is what I would assume TimeSys used) serial driver
> patched up.
Yes. There is a lot of #ifdef CONFIG_KGDB code in their
arch/ppc/8260_io/uart.c If your ppc machine uses the same uart, please let me
know and I'll send you this file.
Which test machine do you have?
> > If you modify kgdb core as well as arch specific files, please try to
> > send separate patches. Single patch will require me to do more work when
> > I merge it against separate patches.
>
> OK. I _hope_ to get you a patch for the serial stuff shortly.
--
Amit Kale
EmSysSoft (http://www.emsyssoft.com)
KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger (http://kgdb.sourceforge.net)
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:07:54PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> On Friday 16 Jan 2004 9:27 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:52:30AM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > It's nice to see someone working on integrating powerpc kgdb with
> > > mainline kgdb. There are a lot of features (like thread lists, gdb
> > > deatch-reattach, automodule loading) powerpc kgdb will inherit
> > > automatically from common core.
> > >
> > > setjmp, longjmp isn't required. search_exception_tables take care of
> > > invalid memory accesses by kgdb.
> > >
> > > In arch/ppc/mm/fault.c:do_page_fault, call bad_page_fault if
> > > debugger_memerr_expected is non-zero instead of holding mmap_sem.
> > >
> > > bad_page_fault calls search_exception_tables at the begining. It takes
> > > care of invalid memory addresses by kgdb as kgdb uses get_user, put_user
> > > to access memory when the access can fail.
> >
> > OK, thanks.
> >
> > > For powerpc arch specific code (like entry.S) look at
> > > http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/linux-2.4.23-kgdb-1.9.patch
> > > It contains powerpc arch specific code for kgdb. I was never able to test
> > > this code, so I don't know whether it works.
> >
> > It might work on some subset of machines, but the serial driver is still
> > broken for SERIAL_IO_MEM machines (which there are a lot of) nor is the
> > ppc 8xx (which is what I would assume TimeSys used) serial driver
> > patched up.
>
> Yes. There is a lot of #ifdef CONFIG_KGDB code in their
> arch/ppc/8260_io/uart.c If your ppc machine uses the same uart, please let me
> know and I'll send you this file.
Ah, that explains it.
> Which test machine do you have?
What I've got locally are a Motorola LoPEC and Motorola Sandpoint (both
with ns1655x UARTs) and an Embedded Planet RPXLite (MPC8xx with a
similar UART to the 8260 variant). But I'm doing this with my
MontaVista hat on, so in the end I'm going to try and test it on
everything that's not a powermac/chrp (more or less).
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/