When the driver is used with a subdevice that is disabled in the
kernel configuration, clang gets a little confused about the
control flow and fails to notice that n_subdevs is only
uninitialized when subdevs is NULL, and we check for that,
leading to a false-positive warning:
drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:1423:19: error: variable 'n_subdevs' is uninitialized when used here
[-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
subdevs, n_subdevs, NULL, 0, NULL);
^~~~~~~~~
drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:999:15: note: initialize the variable 'n_subdevs' to silence this warning
int n_subdevs, ret, i;
^
= 0
Ideally, we would rearrange the code to avoid all those early
initializations and have an explicit exit in each disabled case,
but it's much easier to chicken out and add one more initialization
here to shut up the warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
index 27b61639cdc7..0ca0fc9a67fd 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ int arizona_dev_init(struct arizona *arizona)
unsigned int reg, val;
int (*apply_patch)(struct arizona *) = NULL;
const struct mfd_cell *subdevs = NULL;
- int n_subdevs, ret, i;
+ int n_subdevs = 0, ret, i;
dev_set_drvdata(arizona->dev, arizona);
mutex_init(&arizona->clk_lock);
--
2.20.0
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:33:37PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When the driver is used with a subdevice that is disabled in the
> kernel configuration, clang gets a little confused about the
> control flow and fails to notice that n_subdevs is only
> uninitialized when subdevs is NULL, and we check for that,
> leading to a false-positive warning:
>
> drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:1423:19: error: variable 'n_subdevs' is uninitialized when used here
> [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
> subdevs, n_subdevs, NULL, 0, NULL);
> ^~~~~~~~~
> drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:999:15: note: initialize the variable 'n_subdevs' to silence this warning
> int n_subdevs, ret, i;
> ^
> = 0
>
> Ideally, we would rearrange the code to avoid all those early
> initializations and have an explicit exit in each disabled case,
> but it's much easier to chicken out and add one more initialization
> here to shut up the warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Took me a bit to follow the flow of this function. I agree that without
restructuring it, zero initializing this variable to shut up the warning
is the path of least resistance (clang must evaluate variables in
isolation like I did until I fully read the commit message *facepalm*).
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> index 27b61639cdc7..0ca0fc9a67fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> @@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ int arizona_dev_init(struct arizona *arizona)
> unsigned int reg, val;
> int (*apply_patch)(struct arizona *) = NULL;
> const struct mfd_cell *subdevs = NULL;
> - int n_subdevs, ret, i;
> + int n_subdevs = 0, ret, i;
>
> dev_set_drvdata(arizona->dev, arizona);
> mutex_init(&arizona->clk_lock);
> --
> 2.20.0
>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:33:37PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When the driver is used with a subdevice that is disabled in the
> kernel configuration, clang gets a little confused about the
> control flow and fails to notice that n_subdevs is only
> uninitialized when subdevs is NULL, and we check for that,
> leading to a false-positive warning:
>
> drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:1423:19: error: variable 'n_subdevs' is uninitialized when used here
> [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
> subdevs, n_subdevs, NULL, 0, NULL);
> ^~~~~~~~~
> drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:999:15: note: initialize the variable 'n_subdevs' to silence this warning
> int n_subdevs, ret, i;
> ^
> = 0
>
> Ideally, we would rearrange the code to avoid all those early
> initializations and have an explicit exit in each disabled case,
> but it's much easier to chicken out and add one more initialization
> here to shut up the warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> ---
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Charles